检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:凌晨 LING Cheng(KoGuan Law School,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200240,China)
出 处:《法学论坛》2024年第1期82-92,共11页Legal Forum
摘 要:技术的发展隐藏着对人类主体的消解。智能机器人的诞生既是文明的进步,也带来了法律和伦理的风险,带来了对“人何以为人”的重新思考。在诸多人工智能法律问题中,智能机器人的权利主体问题是最亟待厘清的核心问题。“有限理性存在者”平衡了主体的本真性和理性的有限性,以“范畴差异”的模型统御了自由意志。具有“反事实”因果能力的智能机器人能够借此分析路径融贯的纳入权利主体理论,并且根据人类尊严和法律需求设置不同的权利主体层级。The development of technology hides the dissolution of the human subject.The birth of artificial intelligence is not only the progress of civilization,but also the bud of legal and ethical risks,bringing about a rethinking of "what makes a human being".Among the many legal issues involved in artificial intelligence,the point is artificial Intelligence's capacity as legal subject.It's the core issue that needs to be clarified most urgently."Bounded Rational Existence" balances the authenticity of the subject and the finiteness of reason and governs the free will with the model of "category difference".Intelligent robots with "counterfactual causal capabilities" can be transferred into the legal theory.The law can set up different levels based on human dignity and legal needs.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.77