论帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪中“明知”的判断理路  

On Judgment Methods of"Knowing"in the Crime of Assisting Information Network Criminal Activities

作　　者：王胜华[1] 张星勋 Wang Sheng-hua;Zhang Xing-xun

机构地区：[1]石河子大学法学院

出　　处：《江苏警官学院学报》2023年第6期22-31,共10页Journal of Jiangsu Police Institute

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“新时代新疆反恐的成功经验研究”(21BFX063)。

摘　　要：自帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪设立后,相关案件的发案量呈井喷式增长,一个重要原因便是2019年“两高”的司法解释对该罪的入罪要素“明知”提供了可实践的规范指引。然而,实践中司法人员对“明知”的理解存在教条主义、机械主义的倾向,对“明知”的说理存在含糊不清、语言不详的问题,对“明知”的推定存在依据单一、考量不足的缺陷。因此,有必要秉持刑法教义学的态度,对本罪“明知”的构成要件要素进行实质化限缩。对“明知”应从“事前、事中和事后”的理路进行多元、综合判断,同时还要融入常识常理常情,充分考虑处罚的必要性和正当性。Since the establishment of the crime of assisting information network criminal activities,the number of cases has shown an explosive growth.An important reason is that the The Supreme People's Court and The Supreme People's Procuratorate in 2019 provided practical normative guidance for the incriminating elements of this crime,"knowing".However,the judicial personnel rely on the judicial interpretation of the understanding of"knowing"may be dogmatic,mechanistic.The argumentation of"knowing"is unclear and the language is obscure.The presumption of"knowing"depend on a single basis and insufficient consideration,so there is willful incrimination risk.Therefore,it is necessary to uphold the attitude of the criminal law doctrine,and substantively limit the constituent elements of"knowing",and make multiple and comprehensive judgment on the logic of"knowing"from"before,during and after".At the same time,it is necessary to integrate the common sense,and fully consider the necessity and legitimacy of punishment.

关 键 词：帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 明知 推定 判断理路 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]