检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张亚航 Zhang Yahang(Hebei University of Economics and Business,Shijiazhuang,Hebei,050061)
出 处:《市场周刊》2024年第4期173-176,共4页Market Weekly
基 金:河北省教育厅在读研究生创新能力培养资助项目(项目编号:CXZZSS2024093)。
摘 要:我国对于专利权的保护采取双重保护,即以司法保护和行政保护相结合为特征。这一特点具有一定的内在协调性,符合我国的国情。然而,目前在行政保护的程序、司法保护的效率、行政保护与司法保护权力界定与冲突上依然存在诸多问题,极易造成行政和司法资源的浪费,导致当事人权益和社会公共利益受到不必要的损害。文章旨在对专利权的行政保护和司法保护进行探讨,以协调相应的功能定位和程序衔接,从而解决专利权行政保护和司法保护存在的矛盾和冲突。In our country,the protection of patent rights takes a double protection,which is characterized by the combination of judicial protection and administrative protection.This characteristic has some internal coordination and accords with the reality of our country.How-ever,many problems that need to be solved urgently still exist in practice,such as the procedure of administrative protection and the effi-ciency of judicial protection.The most serious problem is the definition and conflict of the power of administrative protection and judicial protection,which often leads to the waste of administrative and judicial resources,and unnecessary damage to the rights and interests of the parties and social public interests.The purpose of this paper is to discuss the administrative protection and judicial protection of patent right,in order to coordinate the corresponding functional positioning and procedural cohesion,so as to solve the contradiction and conflict between the administrative protection and judicial protection of patent right.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49