机构地区:[1]郑州市第一人民医院中医科,河南郑州450000 [2]内蒙古科技大学包头医学院第一附属医院康复医学科,内蒙古包头014010 [3]四川大学华西医院康复医学科,四川成都610044
出 处:《海南医学》2024年第2期200-205,共6页Hainan Medical Journal
基 金:四川省成都市科技局技术创新研发项目(编号:2019-YF05-00061-SN)。
摘 要:目的 观察烧山火针刺法联合甲氨蝶呤治疗类风湿关节炎(RA)活动期的效果,并探讨其抗炎和调节免疫作用机制。方法 选取2020年2月至2022年10月郑州市第一人民医院收治的60例RA活动期患者纳入研究,按照随机数表法分为常规组和联合组各30例。常规组患者给予甲氨蝶呤治疗,联合组患者给予烧山火针刺法联合甲氨蝶呤治疗,均治疗两周。于治疗两周后比较两组患者的治疗效果,以及治疗前后的中医证候评分、28个关节疾病活动(DAS28)评分、疼痛(VAS)评分、炎性指标[血沉(ESR)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、肿瘤坏死因子-α (TNF-α)、类风湿因子(RF)、抗环瓜氨酸肽(CCP)抗体]、免疫指标(Treg细胞、Th17细胞、Treg/Th17细胞),同时比较两组患者治疗期间的不良反应发生情况。结果 联合组患者的治疗总有效率为93.33%,明显高于常规组的73.33%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);联合组患者治疗两周后的中医证候关节肿胀、冷痛、压痛、晨僵、屈伸不利评分分别为(0.72±0.18)分、(0.70±0.20)分、(0.81±0.22)分、(0.68±0.15)分、(0.77±0.19)分,明显低于常规组的(1.03±0.24)分、(0.96±0.23)分、(1.14±0.26)分、(0.91±0.21)分、(1.09±0.23)分,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);联合组患者治疗两周后的DAS28、VAS评分分别为(2.18±0.33)分、(2.46±0.22)分,明显低于常规组的(3.26±0.47)分、(2.89±0.27)分,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);联合组患者治疗两周后的ESR、抗CCP抗体、RF、CRP、TNF-α水平分别为(16.23±2.29) mm/h、(172.30±30.14) IU/mL、(130.85±15.42) IU/mL、(10.20±1.68) mg/L、(18.95±4.38) pg/mL,明显低于常规组的(21.84±3.41) mm/h、(205.68±36.77) IU/mL、(157.62±24.10) IU/mL、(13.65±2.06) mg/L、(24.51±6.02) pg/mL,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);联合组患者治疗两周的外周血Treg细胞百分比、Treg/Th17比值分别为(2.61±0.35)%、2.44±0.37,明显高于常规组的(2.17±0.28)%、1.68±0.32,Th17细胞百分比Objective To investigate the effect of mountain-burning fire acupuncture combined with metho-trexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis(RA),and to analyze its anti-inflammatory and immune-regulating mecha-nism.Methods Sixty patients with active RA admitted to Zhengzhou First People's Hospital from February 2020 to Oc-tober 2022 were selected and divided into the conventional group and the combined group according to the random num-ber table method,with 30 cases in each group.The patients in the conventional group were treated with methotrexate,and the patients in the combined group were treated with mountain-burning fire acupuncture combined with methotrex-ate,for 2 weeks.After treatment,the therapeutic effects of the two groups were compared,as well as the TCM syndrome score,28 joint disease activity(DAS28)score,pain(Visual Analogue Scale,VAS)score,inflammatory indicators[eryth-rocyte sedimentation rate(ESR)and C-reactive protein(CRP),tumor necrosis factorα(TNF-α),rheumatoid factor(RF),anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide(CCP)antibody],immune indexes(Treg cells,Th17 cells,Treg/Th17 cells)be-fore and after treatment.The incidences of adverse reactions during treatment were also compared between the two groups.Results The total effective rate of the combined group was 93.33%,which was significantly higher than 73.33%of the conventional group(P<0.05).After 2 weeks of treatment,the scores of joint swelling,cold pain,tenderness,morn-ing stiffness,and poor flexion and extension in the combined group were(0.72±0.18)points,(0.70±0.20)points,(0.81±0.22)points,(0.68±0.15)points,and(0.77±0.19)points,respectively,significantly lower than(1.03±0.24)points,(0.96±0.23)points,(1.14±0.26)points,(0.91±0.21)points,and(1.09±0.23)points in the conventional group(P<0.05).After 2 weeks of treatment,the DAS28 and VAS scores of the combined group were(2.18±0.33)points and(2.46±0.22)points,respectively,which were significantly lower than(3.26±0.47)points and(2.89±0.27)points of the conven-tional group(P<0.05).After 2 w
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...