检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨晓[1] YANG Xiao(Pharmacy Intravenous Admixture Service of Nanyang Central Hospital,Nanyang 473000 Henan,China)
机构地区:[1]南阳市中心医院静脉用药调配中心,河南南阳473000
出 处:《中国民康医学》2024年第2期187-189,共3页Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health
摘 要:目的:观察品管圈管理在静脉用药调配中心(PIVAS)的应用效果。方法:选取2020年1—12月该院PIVAS的46名护士作为对照组,实施常规管理;另选取2021年1—12月该院PIVAS的46名护士作为观察组,实施品管圈管理。比较两组配药安全知识知晓率、药物配制差错率和药物配送时间延长率。结果:观察组药物配置流程、药物配伍禁忌、药物剂量换算、用药前正确评估患者、药物输注流程、输注时观察要点等配药安全知识知晓率均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组药物配置差错率为0.48%(12/2500),低于对照组的2.32%(58/2500),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组药物配送延长率为0.36%(9/2500),低于对照组的2.48%(62/2500),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:品管圈管理应用于PIVAS可提高配药安全知识知晓率,以及降低药物配制差错率和药物配送时间延长率的效果优于常规管理效果。Objective:To observe application effects of quality control circle management in pharmacy intravenous admixture service(PIVAS).Methods:A total of 46 nurses in PIVAS of this hospital from January to December 2020 were selected as the control group,and routine management was implemented.A total of 46 nurses in PIVAS of the hospital from January to December 2021 were selected as the observation group,and the quality control circle management was used.The awareness rate of preparation safety knowledge,the error rate of drug preparation and the extension rate of drug delivery time were compared between the two groups.Results:The awareness rates of preparation safety knowledge such as drug preparation process,drug incompatibility,drug dose conversion,correct evaluation of patients before medication,drug infusion process,and observation points during infusion in the observation group were higher than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The error rate of drug preparation in the observation group was 0.48%(12/2500),which was lower than 2.32%(58/2500)in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Further,the extension rate of drug delivery in the observation group was 0.36%(9/2500),which was lower than 2.48%(62/2500)in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusions:The quality control circle management in PIVAS can improve the awareness rate of preparation safety knowledge,and reduce the error rate of drug preparation and the extension rate of drug delivery time.Moreover,it is superior to the routine management.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.19.6