司法视角下中国标准必要专利许可费计算路径研究  

Research on China,s Licensing Fee Calculation Path of Standard Essential Patent from the Legal Perspective

作　　者：陈汇臻 CHEN Huizhen

机构地区：[1]首都经济贸易大学法学院

出　　处：《价格理论与实践》2023年第9期68-75,共8页Price:Theory & Practice

基　　金：北京市法学会2023年市级法学研究课题“首都公平竞争审查例外豁免制度优化研究”阶段性成果,立项编号BLS(2023)C007。

摘　　要：2020年,中国和英国分别通过判决宣告有权对标准必要专利全球许可及其全球许可费计算问题进行管辖。这预示着因管辖法院不同而造成的司法争端会日趋激烈。虽然我国通过司法已经基本确定“公平、合理、无歧视”原则下的标准必要专利许可费,但是法院具体适用的计算原则和方法仍存在完善空间。本文以反垄断法和合同法结合的视角,选择以“无歧视”性为核心阐释“公平、合理、无歧视”原则,并认为法院应在模拟许可谈判的基础上,根据行业惯例结合市场和产品特性,灵活选择计算专利许可费的起点;在具体计算时,则应根据掌握的许可协议信息和专利权人性质选择可比较许可协议法或“自上而下”计算法,以期为我国在司法中平衡专利权人和专利实施人关系的基础上促进高精尖技术发展并打破市场技术壁垒。In 2020,China and the United Kingdom passed judgments declaring that they have the right to govern the global licensing of Standard Essential Patents(SEPs)and the calculation of global licensing fees.It is expected that judicial disputes will become increasingly fierce.Although China's court has basically established the SEPs'licensing fee calculation based on the principle of“fair,reasonable and non-discriminatory”,there is still room for improvement in its principles and methods applied.From both the perspectives of Anti-Monopoly Law and Contract Law,this paper chooses“non-discriminatory”as the center to interpret the principle of“fair,reasonable and non-discriminatory”.It also holds that the court should flexibly choose the starting point for license fee calculation by simulating license ne-gotiation and combining market and product characteristics according to industry practice.In the calculation,our courts should choose the comparative license approach or the“top-down”approach based on license agreement information and the nature of the patentee in order to balance the interests of the patentee and licensee in the judicial system and to promote the development of advanced technology and break down technical barriers in the market.

关 键 词：标准必要专利 “公平、合理、无歧视”原则 专利许可费 可比较许可协议法 “自上而下”计算法 

分 类 号：D923.42[政治法律—民商法学]