国际商事仲裁下公共政策在我国的适用研究  

Research on the Application of Public Policy in International Commercial Arbitration in China

作　　者：闫璟 YAN Jing(College of Comparative Law,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088,China)

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学比较法学研究院,北京100088

出　　处：《成都理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2023年第6期87-97,共11页Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Social Sciences

摘　　要：在国际商事仲裁裁决的承认与执行中,多数国家对《纽约公约》下的公共政策例外采以谨慎适用的态度。我国法院在司法实践中以限制性解释为原则,对公共政策的认定与适用以严格的标准进行审查。尽管我国法院对公共政策例外持有鲜明态度,然而实务中仍存在理解差异大与适用不一致等问题,其本质缘由之一是对公共政策内涵认识的模糊性。在国际层面追求公共政策界定的统一难度极大,但这并不意味着一国国内无需对公共政策的概念和适用进行更具体的解释。就此,可通过对公共政策内涵界定和审查程序的考量,反思公共政策例外适用的问题,从而促进公共政策在我国司法实践中发挥积极作用。In the recognition and enforcement of international commercial arbitration,most countries adopt a cautious attitude towards the public policy under the“New York Convention”.Chinese courts,in their judicial practice,adopt a restrictive interpretation principle and scrutinize the recognition and application of public policy with strict standards.Despite the clear stance of Chinese courts on the public policy exception,there are still issues in practice,such as significant understanding differences and inconsistent applications.One of the fundamental reasons for these issues is the ambiguity in the understanding of the concept of public policy.While achieving uniformity in defining public policy at the international level is extremely challenging,this does not mean that a country should not provide a more specific interpretation of the concept and application of public policy domestically.Therefore,by defining the concept of public policy and considering the review procedure,reflections on the application problems of the public policy exception can be made,thereby promoting the positive role of public policy in China’s judicial practice.

关 键 词：国际商事仲裁 《纽约公约》 公共政策 内涵界定 审查程序 

分 类 号：D997.4[政治法律—国际法学]