检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡洲伟 洪世键[1,3] Hu Zhouwei;Hong Shijian(Research Center for Bay Area(Dapeng)Planning and Development,Xiamen University,Xiamen,Fujian 361005;School of Urban Design of Wuhan University,Wuhan,Hubei 430074;School of Architecture and Civil Engineering,Xiamen University,Xiamen,Fujian 361005)
机构地区:[1]厦门大学湾区(大鹏)规划与发展研究中心,福建厦门361005 [2]武汉大学城市设计学院,湖北武汉430074 [3]厦门大学建筑与土木工程学院,福建厦门361005
出 处:《开放导报》2024年第1期104-112,共9页China Opening Journal
基 金:国家社会科学基金一般项目:基于空间政治经济学视角的旧城空间演替机理与管控机制研究(20BJL108)。
摘 要:农地入市是中国城乡土地使用制度改革的重要内容,而收益分配机制又是农地入市的焦点。深圳的农地入市实践具有典型性,城市更新模式和土地整备利益统筹(整村统筹)模式作为两种农地入市模式,分别体现了“个体利益优先”和“公共利益优先”两种利益分配思路。然而,两种模式在实践中分别会引致“市场失灵”风险和“低效治理”困境。以社会公平为视角,从初始分配公正和结果公正的角度剖析农地入市对发展包容性的影响,可以看到农地入市应该坚持利益共享、责任共担原则,通过“指标统筹调控”,建立农地入市的区域协调机制;坚持公共利益导向,衔接征地制度的收益分配标准,以更好盘活集体建设用地。Rural land marketization is an important part of China’s urban and rural land use system reform,and the benefit allocation mechanism is the point of rural land marketization.The practice of rural land marketization in Shenzhen is typical,with two models of rural land marketization emerging:the urban renewal model and the integrated land preparation model(village-wide coordination),each reflecting two different approaches to benefit distribution prioritizing“individual interests”and“public interests”,respectively.However,both models can lead to the risk of“market failure”and the dilemmas of“inefficient governance”respectively in practice.From the perspective of social equity and from the perspective of initial distribution justice and result justice,the impact of rural land marketization on development inclusiveness can be analyzed.It can be seen that rural land marketization should adhere to the principle of sharing benefits and sharing responsibilities and establish a regional coordination mechanism for rural land marketization through“overall adjustment and control of indicators”.Furthermore,maintaining a public interest-oriented approach and aligning with the revenue distribution standards of the land acquisition system are crucial for better activating collectively owned construction land.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200