检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:崔永日 赵善德 CUI Yongri;ZHAO Shande(Yanji Planning and Design Institute Co.,Ltd.,Yanji,Jilin 133000,China)
机构地区:[1]延吉市规划设计研究院有限公司,吉林延吉133000
出 处:《黑龙江交通科技》2024年第2期60-64,共5页Communications Science and Technology Heilongjiang
摘 要:我国城镇道路中沥青路面的车辙现象比较严重,在沥青路面的车辙计算上,《城镇道路路面设计规范》和《公路沥青路面设计规范》采用了不同的计算方法及分析标准。通过对两种计算方法的适用情况、范围以及计算结果对比分析,总结出两种计算方法的不同及各自的优缺点,《公路沥青路面设计规范》的计算方法考虑的因素更加全面,但对于城镇道路的公交车站及交叉口处的频繁启动及制动路段的情况分析不足,城镇道路应在《公路沥青路面设计规范》计算方法的基础上对频繁启动及制动的特殊路段进行研究及完善。The rutting phenomenon of asphalt pavement in urban roads in China is relatively serious.In the rutting calculation of asphalt pavement,different calculation methods and analysis standards are adopted in the Code for Design of Urban Road Pavements and the Code for Design of Highway Asphalt Pavements.Through the comparison and analysis of the applicability,scope and calculation results of the two calculation methods.The differences and advantages and disadvantages of the two calculation methods are summarized,the calculation method of the Code for Design of Highway Asphalt Pavements is more comprehensive,but the analysis of the frequent starting and braking sections at the bus stops and intersections of urban roads is insufficient.Urban roads should study and improve the special sections of frequent starting and braking on the basis of the calculation method of the Code for Design of Highway Asphalt Pavements.
分 类 号:U412[交通运输工程—道路与铁道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7