青年马克思对历史法学派社会历史观批判四重维度解析  

A Study of Young Marx’s Criticism on the Social and Histori⁃cal View of the Historical School of Law

作　　者：陈沣杰 CHEN Fengjie(School of Marxism,Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Fuzhou 350122,China)

机构地区：[1]福建中医药大学马克思主义学院,福建福州350122

出　　处：《合肥学院学报（综合版）》2023年第6期1-6,共6页Journal of Hefei University：Comprehensive ED

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“马克思资本逻辑批判思想及当代价值研究”(21FKSB004);中国人民大学马克思主义学院2021年基金项目“马克思法哲学批判与历史唯物主义”(581122506621)

摘　　要：19世纪40年代,青年马克思对历史法学派的批判有着独特的提问范式、关注领域、分析门径和思想立场。马克思针对历史实证主义原则,以黑格尔主义作为历史研究的哲学依据,形成了理性论的提问方式;马克思批判了历史法学派的国家观,在关怀德意志民族前途的问题中形成了现实的关注视域;马克思以厚今薄古和一分为二的方法解析历史,形成了辩证的分析门径;马克思批判了历史法学派的地主阶级立场,坚定了革命民主主义的思想立场。马克思对历史法学派社会历史观批判的四重维度清楚地说明了历史唯物主义与历史法学派并无思想上的渊源关系,历史唯物主义正是这样与错误思潮相斗争而形成。In the 1840s,young Marx’s criticism on historical school of law were from such unique dimensions as questioning paradigm,aspects of concern,analytical approach and ideological stance.Marx aimed at the principle of historical positivism and took hegelianism as the philosophical basis of historical research,forming a rational questioning method;Marx criticized the national view of the Historical School of Law and formed a realistic horizon of concern in caring for the future of the German nation;Marx analyzed history with the method of stressing the present and ignoring the past,and formed a dialectical analytical method;Marx criticized the landlord class position of the school and strengthened the ideological position of revolutionary democracy.The four dimensions of Marx’s criticism clearly show that there is no ideological origin relationship between historical materialism and the historical school of law,and historical materialism is formed by fighting against the wrong ideological trend.

关 键 词：青年马克思 历史法学派 历史唯物主义 萨维尼 

分 类 号：A123[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]