检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:任怡 刘康磊 Ren Yi;Liu Kanglei(School of Political Science and Law,University of Jinan,Jinan 250022,China)
出 处:《齐鲁师范学院学报》2023年第6期98-108,共11页Journal of Qilu Normal University
摘 要:行政诉讼审理期限制度作为行政诉讼程序的重要组成部分有着重要的价值:一方面既保证了司法对行政行为的监督,也保障了行政行为的效率性和连续性;另一方面通过时间约束减少了行政相对人的时间成本,避免行政行为对行政相对人造成损害的扩大。从审理期限角度进行系统、全面地实证分析以观察行政诉讼的司法现状,分析问题,有助于在保证公正的前提下,达到行政诉讼效率价值的最大化,最终实现实质化解纠纷、权力监督和高质量行政执法的有机统一。As an important part of the administrative litigation procedure,the administrative litigation trial period system has an important value,which not only ensures the judicial supervision of administrative acts but also guarantees the efficiency and continuity of administrative acts,on the other hand,it reduces the time cost of the administrative counterpart through time constraint and avoids the expansion of the damage caused by administrative acts to the administrative counterpart.A systematic and comprehensive empirical analysis from the perspective of trial duration to observe the judicial status of administrative litigation and analyze the problems helps to maximize the value of administrative litigation efficiency under the premise of ensuring justice,and finally achieve the organic unity of substantive dispute resolution,power supervision and high-quality administrative law enforcement.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7