检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄文晶 Huang Wenjing(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Gaobu Hospital,Dongguan 523270,China)
机构地区:[1]广东省东莞市高埗医院妇产科,广东东莞523270
出 处:《实用妇科内分泌电子杂志》2023年第28期20-22,26,共4页Electronic Journal of Practical Gynecological Endocrinology
摘 要:目的比较阴道内镜与传统宫腔镜检查的临床效果。方法选取60例行检查患者,根据随机数字原则分组,每组30例。对照组行传统宫腔镜检查,观察组行阴道内镜检查。对比两组检查效果。结果观察组检查时间(3.58±0.92)min短于对照组的(6.67±1.53)min,检查总花费(535.56±73.41)元少于对照组的(2085.45±879.62)元,疼痛评分(1.75±0.74)分低于对照组的(3.81±0.69)分,并发症发生率3.33%低于对照组的20.00%,检查失败率0低于对照组的13.33%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组操作水平(95.25±2.13)分高于对照组的(85.18±4.67)分,职业素养(95.89±3.06)分高于对照组的(88.93±3.72)分,安全管理(94.61±2.75)分高于对照组的(86.18±3.50)分,服务态度(93.84±3.08)分高于对照组的(87.41±2.35)分,综合评价(94.70±3.38)分高于对照组的(87.92±4.11)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论患者应用阴道内镜检查优势明显,值得临床推广。Objective To compare the clinical effect of vaginal endoscopy and traditional hysteroscopy.Methods 60 patients were selected for routine examination and divided into 30 patients per group according to the principle of random number.The control group underwent traditional hysteroscopy,and the observation group underwent vaginal endoscopy.The results of the two groups were compared.Results The inspection time of the observation group was(3.58±0.92)min shorter than that of the control group(6.67±1.53)min,and the total inspection cost was(535.56±73.41)yuan less than that of the control group(2085.45±879.62)yuan.The pain score(1.75±0.74)points was lower than that of the control group(3.81±0.69)points,the complication rate(3.33%)was lower than that of the control group(20.00%),and the examination failure rate(0)was lower than that of the control group(13.33%),with statistical significance(P<0.05).The operation level(95.25±2.13)points of the observation group was higher than that of the control group(85.18±4.67)points,the professional quality(95.89±3.06)points was higher than that of the control group(88.93±3.72)points,and the safety management score(94.61±2.75)points was higher than that of the control group(86.18±3.50)points.The score of service attitude(93.84±3.08)points was higher than that of control group(87.41±2.35)points,and the score of comprehensive evaluation(94.70±3.38)points was higher than that of control group(87.92±4.11)points,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion The application of vaginal endoscopy in patients has obvious advantages and is worthy of clinical promotion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.119