不同微生物检验法应用于念珠菌性阴道炎患者阴道分泌物检验中的有效性比较探讨  

Comparative study on the effectiveness of different microbiological testing methods in vaginal secretion testing of patients with candida vaginitis

作　　者：薄海 Bo Hai(Clinical Laboratory,Baicheng Maternal and Child Health Care and Family Planning Service Center,Baicheng 137000,China)

机构地区：[1]白城市妇幼保健计划生育服务中心检验科,吉林白城137000

出　　处：《实用妇科内分泌电子杂志》2023年第28期112-114,共3页Electronic Journal of Practical Gynecological Endocrinology

摘　　要：目的分析不同微生物检验法应用于念珠菌性阴道炎患者阴道分泌物检验中的有效性。方法选取50例念珠菌性阴道炎患者,患者均进行临床微生物检验诊断,采集样本实施不同检验方法,包括镜检法、培养法以及凝集法,分析上述三种方式阳性检出率。结果镜检法的阳性检出率为96.00%,培养法的阳性检出率为80.00%,凝集法的阳性检出率为72.00%,镜检法的阳性检出率明显高于培养法以及凝集法,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在微生物检验法中,镜检法的念珠菌性阴道炎阳性检出率高于培养法以及凝集法,但为提高临床诊断准确率,需联合使用,为临床提供科学的数据。Objective To analyze the effectiveness of different microbiological tests in vaginal secretion examination of patients with candida vaginitis.Methods 50 patients with candidal vaginitis were selected,all of whom were diagnosed by clinical microbiological examination.Samples were collected and different test methods,including microscopy,culture and agglutination,were used to analyze the positive detection rates of the above three methods.Results The positive detection rate of microscopy was 96.00%,that of culture method was 80.00%,and that of agglutination method was 72.00%.The positive detection rate of microscopy method was significantly higher than that of culture method and agglutination method,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Among the microbiological tests,the positive detection rate of candida vaginitis by microscopy is higher than that by culture and agglutination,but in order to improve the accuracy of clinical diagnosis,it should be combined to provide scientific data for clinical use.

关 键 词：微生物检验法 念珠菌性阴道炎 阴道分泌物检验 

分 类 号：R711.31[医药卫生—妇产科学] R446.5[医药卫生—临床医学]