检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱冬梅 张颖[1] ZHU Dongmei;ZHANG Ying(School of Economics and Management,Southeast University,Nanjing 211189,China)
出 处:《中国证券期货》2024年第1期4-9,共6页Securities & Futures of China
基 金:国家重点研发计划(2021QY2100)资助。
摘 要:中美关系是当今世界上最为重要的国家间关系,值此百年未有之大变局,金融作为现代经济的制高点,近年来加剧竞争的大国博弈日益转向非传统的经济金融领域。自2021年以来,在美中概股不断遭遇市场做空,已严重影响我国的海外金融利益。本文通过分析中美博弈发展历程及演化机制,尤其是拜登政府执政以来的对华政策,比较研究了中美资本市场做空机制的做空主体、做空模式、监管制度、引发风险及其对我国的影响。本文研究为我国面对复杂多变的国际环境如何始终保持定力,有效应对美国对我国实施资本市场做空的持续打压提供理论支撑。China-U.S.relations are the most important inter-country relations in the world.Within a wider context of the once-in-a-century changes,finance as the commanding height of modern economy,the intensified competition between big countries has increasingly turned to non-traditional economic and financial fields in recent years.Since 2021,Chinese stocks in the U.S.have been continuously suffered from short blow,which has seriously affected China s overseas financial interests.This paper first analyzes the development history and the underlying mechanism of the China-U.S.relations,especially the Biden administration s policy towards China.Then the paper compares and studies the short-selling subjects,short-selling modes,regulatory systems,possible risks of the short selling mechanism of the U.S.-China capital markets and the impact on China.The research in this paper provides theoretical support for how our country can always maintain its determination in the face of a complex and volatile international environment and effectively respond to the continuous suppression by shorting in the capital market of the United States.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38