新史料与新问题:学术史的国际竞赛——从戴密微《吐蕃僧诤记》说起  

New Historical Materials and New Questions:International Competition in Academic History,a Topic from Paul Demiéeville's Le concile de Lhasa

作　　者：葛兆光 Ge Zhaoguang(National Institute for Advanced Humanistic Studies,Fudan University,Shanghai 200433,China)

机构地区：[1]复旦大学文史研究院,上海200433

出　　处：《复旦学报（社会科学版）》2024年第1期1-11,33,共12页Fudan Journal（Social Sciences）

摘　　要：这篇论文对8世纪桑耶寺佛教辩论事件研究的学术史进行梳理,指出这一有关吐蕃史上相当重要的事件,如何在文献与历史上逐渐被揭开、积累和推进。特别要讨论的是,为何法国学者戴密微能抓住关键史料,形成问题意识,写出《吐蕃僧诤记》这样的名著?为何日本学者能继续发现新问题和新史料,做出关键的推进?特别是,这一问题又如何反转过来触发了日本学者对中国禅宗“南顿北渐”传统说法的重新认识?通过一系列学术史的讨论,本文想指出,即使在历史研究中,也存在着国际间的竞赛,中国学者不能不像陈寅恪说的那样,力争“预”国际学术之“流”。This paper combs the academic history of the Buddhist debate at the Temple of Bsam Yas in the eighth century.It points out how this very important event in the history of Tibet was gradually revealed,accumulated and advanced in literature and history.It pays special attention to the two questions:why the French scholar Paul Demiéville was able to grasp key historical materials,form a problem awareness,and work out a masterpiece Le concile de Lhasa?Why could Japanese scholars carry on to discover new issues and new historical materials and make key advancement?In particular,how did this issue in turn trigger Japanese scholars to re-understand the traditional saying of Chinese Zen Buddhism's"Gradual enlightenment in the south,sudden enlightenment in the north"?Through a series of discussions on academic history,this article would like to point out that even in historical research,there has been international competition.Chinese scholars must strive to"pre-empt"the"flow"of international academics as Chen Yinke said.

关 键 词：戴密微 《吐蕃僧诤记》 禅宗史 新史料与新问题 预流 

分 类 号：K28[历史地理—历史学] B948[历史地理—中国史] K242[哲学宗教—宗教学]