检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈靖翕 陈洋[1] 王子翱 彭莉[1] CHEN Jingxi;CHEN Yang;WANG Ziao;PENG Li(Guizhou University,Guiyang 550025,China)
机构地区:[1]贵州大学,贵阳550025
出 处:《包装工程》2024年第4期253-261,共9页Packaging Engineering
基 金:贵州省科技计划项目(黔科合支撑【2021】一般396)。
摘 要:目的为了探究一种更高效的苗绣纹样检索方式,通过对手绘草图检索及文本检索过程中的认知负荷来进行对比研究。方法首先通过构建认知负荷信息检索过程模型,对5个认知阶段的平均认知负荷及所需时间进行实验对比;其次通过眼动指标(持续注视时间、眼球扫视振幅、眼球直径)及NASA-TLX评估对两种检索过程的认知负荷进行分析;最后基于眼动追踪得到可视化眼动数据(热点图、注视轨迹)验证是否符合检索任务需求。结论基于手绘草图的图形检索方式更适合于苗绣纹样检索,通过主、客观融合对比实验验证了草图检索的高效性,同时也验证了眼动追踪和NASA_TLX具有相关性,能更有效地进行认知负荷测量。The work aims to explore a more efficient way of retrieving Miao embroidery patterns by conducting a comparative study on the cognitive load during hand-drawn sketch retrieval and text-based retrieval processes.A cognitive load information retrieval model was constructed to experimentally compare the average cognitive load and required time across five cognitive stages.Eye-tracking metrics(such as dwell time,saccade amplitude,and pupil diameter)and NASA-TLX evaluations were employed to analyze the cognitive load of the two retrieval processes.Finally,visual eye-tracking data(heatmap and gaze path)were obtained to validate whether they met the requirements of the retrieval task.The graph retrieval method based on hand-drawn sketches is found to be more suitable for Miao embroidery pattern retrieval.The efficiency of sketch retrieval is validated through subjective and objective integrated comparative experi-ments.Additionally,the correlation between eye-tracking and NASA-TLX is confirmed,making them more effective for measuring cognitiveload.
分 类 号:TB472[一般工业技术—工业设计]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38