检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑家欣 Zheng Jiaxin(School of Literature and Media,Lingnan Normal University,Zhanjiang 524048,China)
机构地区:[1]岭南师范学院文学与传媒学院,广东湛江524048
出 处:《台州学院学报》2024年第1期18-24,32,共8页Journal of Taizhou University
摘 要:里尔克和策兰两位现代诗巨匠在面对各自的语言困境下,都尝试寻求诗歌语言在再现现实上的突破,诗风趋向晦涩玄奥,产生了陌生化的效果。在里尔克影响下,策兰的不少诗作与里尔克有互文性关系,玫瑰诗是其中的典型代表。两者的玫瑰诗以不同的方式呈现出艺术与现实、诗歌与历史之间的张力。里尔克的诗歌组接意象构筑了一个无时间性的、封闭的美学空间;而策兰的诗歌构建的文本现实承载历史记忆,重新激活诗歌再现现实的可能性。Rilke and Celan,the two masters of modern poetry,tried to seek a breakthrough in the representation of reality in their poems facing their own language dilemmas.Under the influence of Rilke,many of Celan's poems have an intertextual relationship with Rilke's.Their rose poems are one of the typical examples,which present the tension between art and reality,poetry and history in differ⁃ent ways.Rilke's poems combine images to construct a timeless and closed aesthetic space,while Cel⁃an's poems construct a textual reality that carries historical memory and reactivates the possibility of poetry to reproduce reality.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15