检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:于喜红[1] 杨瑞[1] 刘继伟[1] 弓莉 周静[1] 王振静[2] 高夏[3] YU Xihong;YANG Rui;LIU Jiwei;GONG Li;ZHOU Jing;WANG Zhenjing;GAO Xia(Department of Radiology,Henan Provincial Chest Hospital,Zhengzhou 450008,China;Department of Endoscopy,Henan Provincial Chest Hospital,Zhengzhou 450008,China;Department of Research and Teaching,Henan Provincial Chest Hospital,Zhengzhou 450008,China)
机构地区:[1]河南省胸科医院(郑州大学附属胸科医院)医学影像科,河南郑州450008 [2]河南省胸科医院(郑州大学附属胸科医院)内镜诊疗部,河南郑州450008 [3]河南省胸科医院(郑州大学附属胸科医院)科研教学科,河南郑州450008
出 处:《中国医学影像技术》2024年第2期241-245,共5页Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
摘 要:目的 观察薄层CT多征象联合多平面重组(MPR)诊断气管支气管结核(TBTB)的价值。方法 回顾性分析234例接受胸部薄层CT扫描的TBTB患者并行MPR,观察病变直接与间接表现;比较轴位平扫CT(直接观察法)与其联合MPR(联合观察法)的诊断效能。结果 直接观察法诊断TBTB的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及准确率分别为38.88%(201/517)、98.13%(1 789/1 823)、85.53%(201/235)、84.99%(1 789/2 105)及85.04%(1 990/2 340),联合观察法上述各项分别为91.10%(471/517)、98.85%(1 802/1 823)、95.54%(471/493)、97.51%(1 802/1 848)及97.14%(2 273/2 340);2种方法间敏感度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及准确率差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.001),而特异度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 根据薄层CT多征象联合MPR可有效诊断TBTB。Objective To observe value of thin slice CT multiple signs combined with multiplanar reformation(MPR)for diagnosing tracheobronchial tuberculosis(TBTB).Methods Data of 234 TBTB patients who underwent chest thin slice CT scanning were retrospectively analyzed.MPR was performed,the direct signs and indirect signs of TBTB were observed.The diagnostic efficacy of axial plain CT images(direct observation)and of MPR combined with the former(combined observation)were compared.Results The sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value,negative predictive value and accuracy of direct observation was 38.88%(201/517),98.13%(1789/1823),85.53%(201/235),84.99%(1789/2105)and 85.04%(1990/2340),respectively,of combined observation was 91.10%(471/517),98.85%(1802/1823),95.54%(471/493),97.51%(1802/1848)and 97.14%(2273/2340),respectively.Significant differences of sensitivity,positive predictive value,negative predictive value and accuracy were found(all P<0.001),whereas no significant difference of specificity was found between 2 methods(P>0.05).Conclusion Thin slice CT multiple signs combined with MPR could be used to effectively diagnose TBTB.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.226.87.235