基于数据分析的武术长短兵比赛的启示与理性反思  

Insights and Reflective Analysis of Wushu Long and Short Weapons Competitions Based on Data Analytics

作　　者：阮文翩 孙岳[1] Ruan Wenpian;Sun Yue(College of Sports Science,South China Normal University,Guangzhou 510006,China)

机构地区：[1]华南师范大学体育科学学院,广东广州510006

出　　处：《体育科技文献通报》2024年第1期74-78,共5页Bulletin of Sport Science & Technology

基　　金：2023年国家社科基金一般项目(项目编号:23BTY081)。

摘　　要：本文运用逻辑分析、SPSS23.0和Amos23.0软件统计等方法,对广东第十一届大运会武术长短兵比赛进行研究。结果表明:①在赛事满意度中,代码CQ2(执裁水平)、代码CF3(统一提供的电子护具)2个测量指标表现较差;②竞赛设定满意度中,代码GS2(清晰击中得分部位才能得分)、代码TS2(使用转身和跳跃技术)、代码S1(对此次规则会做出积极评价)3个测量指标表现较差,其他模块内容满意度评分基本持平,结果趋向“满意”。建议①设计组别和金牌数量时需要细致考量;②裁判员除了要提升专业判罚水平,更要设计裁判奖惩制度;③护具要解决打击“前手和大腿”不得分问题;④技术上允许转身和跳跃的加分项,但应限制次数;③得分应实现电子护具主导、人工裁判校正相结合的方式。This study employs logical analysis,SPSS 23.0,Amos 23.0 software,and other methodologies to conduct a comprehensive investigation and analysis of the 1lth Guangdong University Games Wushu Long and Short Weapons events.Findings reveal that:(1)in terms of event satisfaction,the measurement indicators CQ2(referee proficiency)and CF3(consistent provision of electronic protective gear)demonstrated subpar performance;(2)within competition setting satisfaction,measurement indicators GS2(clear scoring by hitting specific areas),TS2(use of turning and jumping techniques),and S1(positive assessment of the current rules)exhibited inadequacies,while satisfaction scores for other module contents remained generally balanced,leaning towards an overall""satisfied"trend.Recommendations include:(1)meticulous consideration in designing categories and determining gold medal quantities;(2)referee enhancement in both professional judgment and the implementation of a referee reward system;(3)addressing the issue of non-scoring for strikes to the front hand and thigh in protective gear;(4)allowing bonus points for turning and jumping techniques with limited frequency;(5)adopting a scoring approach that combines electronic protective gear dominance with manual referee correction.

关 键 词：武术 长短兵 大学生 

分 类 号：G852[文化科学—民族体育]