检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张羽丰 Zhang Yufeng(School of Law,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430000)
机构地区:[1]武汉大学法学院,武汉430000
出 处:《西部学刊》2024年第3期62-65,共4页Journal of Western
摘 要:行政协议诉讼中适用情势变更原则的理论基础在于行政协议具有协议性且受公平原则约束,现实基础在于司法解释预留空间、救济体系亟待完善。从对22份有效裁判文书的分析来看,情势变更原则在行政协议诉讼中的适用存在的问题主要是混淆情势变更原则与相关概念、情势变更与行政优益权界限不清、忽视情势变更原则适用的时间条件,其原因在于学理探究不足,欠缺立法指引,实践做法不统一。解决上述问题,应准确界定情势变更原则与不可抗力等相关概念,明晰情势变更原则的适用条件,发挥司法判例的指导作用。The theoretical basis for the application of the principle of change of circumstances in administrative agreement litigation is that the administrative agreement has the nature of contract and is subject to the principle of fairness.The practical bases are that the judicial interpretation reserved possibilities for the application of the principle and the urgent need of improving the remedial system.Based on the analysis of 22 effective judgments,the main problems of the application of the principle of change of circumstances in administrative agreement litigation is that the confusion between the principle and related concepts,the ambiguous boundaries between the principle and administrative prior rights,and neglects of temporal conditions of the principle.These problems are results of insufficient theoretical inquiry,lack of legislative guidance and the difference of application.To solve these problems,we should clearly define the principle of change of circumstances,force majeure and other related concepts,clarify the conditions for the application of the principle,and the application should be guided by judicial precedents.
分 类 号:D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249