检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:缪章艳 采宇 MIAO Zhang-yan;CAI Yu(School of Humanities and International Education Exchange,Anhui University of Chinese Medicine,Hefei 230012,Anhui,China)
机构地区:[1]安徽中医药大学人文与国际教育交流学院,安徽合肥230012
出 处:《黔南民族师范学院学报》2023年第6期35-40,66,共7页Journal of Qiannan Normal University for Nationalities
基 金:安徽中医药大学人才基金项目(2022rcyb022);安徽省质量工程项目(2022xsxx111)阶段性成果。
摘 要:本文从句法及语义的层面探讨了英语副词的语法特性,并在前人将副词分为S-,VP-,AP-和Advp-的基础上,随机对37名非英语专业大—学生在修饰和否定两方面进行感知测试。发现在以上四大类副词中,就修饰范围而言,由于AP-和Advp-类副词和中文的修饰模式相似,学生具有较高的感知准确率;就否定范围而言,Neg>Adv类型中,否定词和频率副词连用容易产生歧义,导致学生感知准确率较低。This paper explores the grammatical characteristics of English adverbs from the perspectives of syntax and semantics.Based on the previous classification of adverbs into S-,VP-,AP-,and Advp-,37 non English major college students were randomly tested for their perception of modification and negation.It was found that among the four categories of adverbs mentioned above,in terms of modification scope,students have a higher perceptual accuracy due to the similarity in modification patterns between AP-and Advp-adverbs and Chinese.In terms of the scope of negation,in the Neg>Adv type,the combination of negation words and frequency adverbs can easily lead to ambiguity,resulting in lower perceptual accuracy for students.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222