论现代文学“以文见史”写作传统的表征及其意义  

On the Representation and Significance of the Writing Tradition of“Seeing History through Literature”in Modern Literature

作　　者：王寰鹏[1] Wang Huanpeng(School of Chinese Language and Literature,Shandong Normal University,Jinan Shandong,250014)

机构地区：[1]山东师范大学文学院,山东济南250014

出　　处：《山东师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2023年第5期32-41,共10页Journal of Shandong Normal University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社科基金项目“百年中国文学‘以文见史’传统研究(1917-2019)”(20BZW147)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：“以文见史”是现代文学写作的一种初始状态,也是跨越百年自成格局的文学传统。较能体现此传统延续性、稳定性的元素是话语体系,在比喻性话语中交错出现隐喻、反讽、替换、转喻等话语范式,在非比喻性话语中则主要有显喻、直陈的话语形式。百年中国文学中的现实话语与历史话语相互激发,既借历史语义进行现实言说,又用现实言说来激活历史语义;历史、现实、未来始终处于同一个话语结构之中。对上述传统的认知可以促成文学史研究由创作方法、作家作品、思潮流派史向更根本性的“写作史”的转换。“Seeing history through literature”is an initial state of modern literary writing and also a literary tradition that spans a century and has formed its own pattern.The element that best reflects the continuity and stability of this tradition is the discourse system,in which metaphorical discourse paradigms such as metaphor,irony,substitution,and metonymy interlace,while non-metaphorical discourse mainly consists of explicit and direct discourse forms.The realistic discourse and historical discourse in Chinese literature over the past century are mutually stimulated,making use of historical semantics to express realistic comments and using realistic comments to activate historical semantics;history,reality,and future are always within the same discourse structure.The recognition of the above traditions may lead to a shift in the study of literary history from creative methods,writers’works,and the history of ideological schools to a more fundamental“writing history”.

关 键 词：以文见史 写作传统 表征 文学史意义 

分 类 号：I206[文学—中国文学]