检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨田甜 Yang Tiantian(School of History,Qinghai Normal University,Xining 810016;Law School,Qinghai Minzu University,Xining 810007)
机构地区:[1]青海师范大学历史学院,西宁810016 [2]青海民族大学法学院,西宁810007
出 处:《西部学刊》2024年第4期76-79,共4页Journal of Western
摘 要:清代人口快速增长,导致资源紧张,民间为获利而诬告的情况频发,加之,治理策略失当,处理力度欠缺,以致诬告之风盛行。历代各朝关于禁诬均有明确规定,清代《大清律例》关于诬告在行为构成、处罚规定上更加完善。《刑案汇览》中关于诬告案件的处理表明,清朝中央在治理诬告案件中有其特定治理路径及逻辑范式,通过“正条”与“比照”之法律适用,力求罪名与刑罚平衡。In the Qing Dynasty,the population grew very fast,which led to resource constraints and the frequent occurrence of false accusation by the people for sake of profit.What’s more,the governance strategies were improper and the official efforts in handling false accusation were insufficient resulting in frequent cases of false accusations.There have been clear provisions on the prohibition of false accusations in all dynasties,but the Qing Code were more perfect on false accusations in terms of behavior composition and punishment regulations.The handling of false accusation in Conspectus of Penal Cases shows that the central government of the Qing Dynasty had its own specific governance path and logical paradigm in the management of these cases,striving for a balance between the crime and the penalty through the application of the“legal provision”and“mutatis mutandis”.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.64