高校职员职称制度研究——基于10所“双一流”高校职员职称政策文本的定性分析  

Research on College Staff’s Title System:AQualitative Study of Policy Documents of Double-first Universities

作　　者：范竹君 FAN Zhujun(Faculty of Education,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200062,China)

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学教育学部,上海200062

出　　处：《宁波大学学报（教育科学版）》2024年第1期27-35,共9页Journal of Ningbo University(Educational Science Edition)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“高校组织环境与教师活力的本土化研究”(18YJC880116);华东师范大学2021年度新时代教师队伍建设研究课题“双一流背景下高校职员队伍建设困境及对策研究”(HSJY202106)。

摘　　要：近年来,随着高校教师职称评审权的下放,部分“双一流”高校在建立职员职级通道的基础上,实行高教管理系列专业技术职务评聘制度,以畅通职员发展通道,激发职员队伍专业化发展的内在动力。研究以10所“双一流”高校职员职称政策为研究对象,运用Nvivo 12软件进行文本分析,认为高校职员职称制度遵循促进共同发展的目标逻辑、坚守岗位特色的实践逻辑和推进公平治理的机制逻辑,但在政策体系的稳定性、评价导向的科学性、资质设置的合理性、评审程序的公正性等方面存在现实困境。基于研究成果提出了达成职员职称制度共识、回归卓越管理评价导向、提高政策内容的可操作性、完善职员职称评审程序等优化路径,以期破解高校职员队伍建设问题。With the decentralization of the professional title evaluation,some universities have expanded the development pathways by streamlining the professional title policy to motivate staff’s rise.This study used the Nvivo12 software to examine the texts of professional title policies of 10“double first-class”universities.It suggested that the system of university professional titles follows the goal logic of promoting common development,the practical logic of sustaining job characteristics and the mechanism logic of fostering fair governance while there are still practical dilemmas in policy system,evaluation orientation,qualification match and evaluation process.It thus proposed that it is necessary for universities to formulate coordinated and stable policy systems and operational policies,return to the evaluation guidance of management excellence and optimize the review process to lay a sustainable foundation for college staff construction.

关 键 词：“双一流”高校 职员 职称制度 政策文本 

分 类 号：G647[文化科学—高等教育学]