检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:成剑 袁媛[2] 彭瑞潭 郁红礼[2,3,4] 崔小兵[2] CHENG Jian;YUAN Yuan;PENG Ruitan;YU Hongli;CUI Xiaobing(Jinghua Pharmaceutical Group Co.,Ltd.,Nantong 226000,China;Nangjing University of Chinese Medicine,Nangjing 210023,China;Key Laboratory of Chinese Medicine Processing of Jiangsu Province,Nangjing 210023,China;Engineering Center of State Ministry of Education for Standardization of Chinese Medicine Processing,Nangjing 210023,China)
机构地区:[1]精华制药集团股份有限公司,江苏南通226000 [2]南京中医药大学,江苏南京210023 [3]江苏省中药炮制重点实验室,江苏南京210023 [4]国家教育部中药炮制规范化及标准化工程研究中心,江苏南京210023
出 处:《中医药信息》2024年第2期16-20,25,共6页Information on Traditional Chinese Medicine
基 金:江西省“双千计划”项目(S2019CXTD2300)。
摘 要:目的:比较天然朱砂与合成朱砂的药效及急性毒性差异。方法:采用水合氯醛阈上催眠实验模型,以小鼠睡眠潜伏期及睡眠时长为指标,考察两种朱砂的催眠作用药效是否存在差异;以最大给药浓度和最大给药体积(48 g/kg)进行灌胃给药,观察两种朱砂的小鼠急性毒性反应;以小鼠体质量、小鼠脏器指数为指标,并观察小鼠不同脏器组织病理切片,观察两种朱砂对不同脏器毒性的影响。结果:水合氯醛催眠实验模型显示,不同剂量的天然朱砂与合成朱砂(16.67、83.33 mg/kg)均可延长水合氯醛诱导的小鼠睡眠时长,表明两种朱砂均具有催眠作用。在一次性灌胃600倍临床用药最大剂量(48 g/kg)情况下,两种朱砂均对小鼠无急性毒性作用,小鼠体质量、小鼠脏器指数与空白组比较无显著性差异,对各脏器均未产生明显毒性。结论:天然朱砂与合成朱砂均具有催眠作用,药效无显著性差异,且均无明显急性毒性作用。Objective:To compare the efficacy and toxicity of natural cinnabar and synthetic cinnabar.Methods:This paper adopted the suprathreshold hypnosis experiment model of chloral hydrate,and used the sleep latency and sleep duration of mice as indicators to investigate whether there is a difference in the hypnotic efficacy of the two types of cinnabar.The acute toxicity of two types of cinnabar in mice was observed after being gavaged at the maximum concentration and maximum volume of the drug(48 g/kg).The effects of two kinds of cinnabar on the toxicity of different organs were observed by using the body mass and organ index of mice as indexes and pathological sections of different organs.Results:The hypnotic experiment model of chloral hydrate showed that both natural and synthetic cinnabar(16.67 mg/kg,83.33 mg/kg)could prolong the sleep duration of mice induced by chloral hydrate,indicating that both natural and synthetic cinnabar had hypnotic effects.At a dose of 600 times the maximum dose(48 g/kg)of clinical medication administered by gavage,both types of cinnabar had no acute toxic effects on the mice,and there was no difference in mouse body weight,organ index,or toxicity to any organ compared to the blank group.Conclusion:The above research indicates that both natural cinnabar and synthetic cinnabar have hypnotic effects,and there is no significant difference in efficacy.Both types of cinnabar have no significant acute toxic effects.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.252.203