检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何君[1] HE Jun(The Supreme Peoples Court,Beijing 100745)
机构地区:[1]最高人民法院,北京100745
出 处:《行政法学研究》2024年第1期84-95,共12页ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW
摘 要:时效作为国家赔偿法中的重要制度,属于实践中应用广泛,但理论研究欠缺或研究不够深入的一个领域,长期以来存在理解和适用上的差异化。国家赔偿时效理论研究主要症结在于请求时效定性的多样性,存在定性为诉讼时效、起诉期限、请求权时效的复杂现象,这既不利于请求时效理论的体系化研究,也不利于请求时效适用标准的统一。通过对现象背后原因的梳理和检讨,以及对司法解释定性选择的归纳总结,明确将请求时效定性为诉讼时效。在此基础上,对定性为诉讼时效语境下请求时效的适用进行分析论述。As an important institution in state compensation law,limitation period belongs to a field that is widely used in practice but lacks in-depth theoretical research.It has long been understood and applied diversely.The main crux of the research on limitation period of state compensation theory lies in the diversity of characterization of limitation period of claims.There are complex phenomena characterized as statute of limitations,the time limit for litigation and limitation period of claims,which is not conducive to the systematic study of the theory of limitation period of claims,nor to the unification of the application standards of limitation period of claims.Through the combing and review of the reasons behind the phenomenon and the summary of the qualitative choices of judicial interpretations,it is clear that limitation period of claims is defined as the statute of limitations.On this basis,a systematic analysis is made on the application of limitation period of claims in the context of statute of limitations.
分 类 号:D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7