自动化行政中算法的可公开性及其范围  

The Publicability of Algorithms in Automated Administration and Its Scope

作　　者：于一帆 YU Yi-fan(School of Law,Southeast University,Nanjing 211189)

机构地区：[1]东南大学法学院,江苏南京211189

出　　处：《行政法学研究》2024年第1期159-167,共9页ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW

基　　金：2019年度国家社科基金青年项目“商业秘密侵权损害赔偿实证研究”(项目编号:19CFX047);2021年度江苏省研究生科研创新计划项目“数字政府建设背景下算法行政法治化研究”(项目编号:KYCX21_0073)。

摘　　要：在自动化行政中,算法的本质是行政规则,其可公开性与可解释性之间存在实质性差异。可解释性关注的是实现透明算法,而可公开性更侧重于实现透明政府。有鉴于此,在行政法制度体系中,可解释性对应行政行为说明理由制度,可公开性对应政府信息公开制度。基于算法的行政规则本质,以及《政府信息公开条例》关于政府信息主动公开范围的规定,自动化行政中的算法应当予以公开。同时,其应当实现“最大范围的公开”,即采取源代码公开的形式选择。此外,如果确因安全因素不予公开算法,则需要满足利益冲突标准、价值比较标准与替代方案标准等三项利益衡量标准。In automated administration,the essence of algorithms is administrative rules,and there are substantial differences between publicability and interpretability.Interpretability is concerned with im⁃plementing transparent algorithms,while openness is more concerned with implementing transparent govern⁃ment.In view of this,in the system of administrative law,interpretability corresponds to the system of ex⁃plaining reasons for administrative acts,and openness corresponds to the system of government information disclosure.Based on the essence of the administrative rules of algorithms and the provisions on the scope of active disclosure of government information in the Regulations on Government Information Disclosure,algo⁃rithms in automated administration should be disclosed,and at the same time,they should realize the“maxi⁃mum scope of disclosure”,that is,the form of source code disclosure should be chosen.In addition,if it is necessary to not disclose the algorithm due to security factors,three interest measurement criteria such as conflict of interest standard,value comparison standard and alternative scheme standard should be met.

关 键 词：自动化行政 算法公开 政府信息公开 算法解释 

分 类 号：D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]