检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨闯 YANG Chuang(China Railway 19th Bureau Group Sixth Engineering Co.,Ltd.,Wuxi 214000,Jiangsu,China)
机构地区:[1]中铁十九局集团第六工程有限公司,江苏无锡214000
出 处:《资源信息与工程》2024年第1期86-89,共4页Resource Information and Engineering
摘 要:隧道施工无法避免下穿老旧房屋建筑物浅基础,如何有效地控制隧道开挖引起建筑物基础所处地层发生沉降一直是业内研究的重点。本文以无锡地铁区间隧道穿越既有建筑物为例,首先分析了全断面开挖法施工对既有建筑物基础的影响规律,然后对比分析采用CRD(Cross Diaphragm,交叉中隔墙法)和三台阶开挖方法对开挖面各部位围岩的影响规律。研究表明:采用全断面开挖方法下穿既有建筑物,既有建筑物基础各部位会发生不均匀沉降,靠近隧道掘进方向的建筑物基础监测点的沉降量较大;三台阶开挖方法相较于CRD开挖方法更有利于地铁隧道的稳定、安全。Tunnel construction inevitably involves passing through the shallow foundations of existing old buildings.How to effectively control the deformation and settlement of building foundation caused by tunnel excavation has been a focus of research.Taking Wuxi metro interval tunnel passing through the existing buildings as an example,this paper first analyzed the influence of full-section excavation on the foundations of existing buildings.Subsequently,the influences of Cross Diaphragm(CRD)and three-step excavation methods on the surrounding rock at different parts of the excavation surface were compared.The study showed that employing the full-section excavation method for tunneling through existing buildings results in uneven settlement of the foundations.The settlement is particularly significant at monitoring points close to the tunnel boring direction.In comparison,the three-step excavation method proved more conducive to the stability and safety of underground tunnels than the CRD excavation method.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.124.186