检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周行 ZHOU Xing(School of Intellectual Property,Nanjing University of Technology,Nanjing 210018,China)
机构地区:[1]南京理工大学知识产权学院,江苏南京210018
出 处:《镇江高专学报》2024年第1期51-55,共5页Journal of Zhenjiang College
摘 要:随着时代的发展,合作治理逐渐成为行政治理模式的主流,行政主体理论逐渐难以自洽。应将行政主体分为职权行政主体和职能行政主体,赋予履行行政职能的私主体职能行政主体地位。解除行政主体与行政诉讼被告之间的连带关系,公私合作被告的确认先判断私主体是否为职能性行政主体。扩大行政调解范围,摆脱公私合作背景下行政诉讼制度面临的困境。With the development of the times,cooperative governance has gradually become the mainstream of administrative governance models.The theory of administrative entities is gradually difficult to reconcile.The theory of administrative subject should be divided into functional administrative subject and authority administrative subject,and the status of functional administrative subject should be given to the private subject performing administrative functions.To terminate the joint and several relationships between the administrative subject and the defendant in administrative litigation,the confirmation of the defendant in public-private cooperation should first determine whether the private subject is a functional administrative subject.We should expand the scope of administrative mediation and remove the difficulties faced by the administrative litigation system in the context of public-private cooperation.
分 类 号:D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49