检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:洪竞科 蒋静雅 刘炳胜 Hong Jingke;Jiang Jingya;Liu Bingsheng(School of Management Science and Real Estate,Chongqing University,Chongqing 400045,China;School of Public Administration,Chongqing University,Chongqing 400045,China)
机构地区:[1]重庆大学管理科学与房地产学院,重庆400045 [2]重庆大学公共管理学院,重庆400045
出 处:《财经研究》2023年第12期48-61,共14页Journal of Finance and Economics
基 金:国家自然科学基金委员会与美国国家科学基金会可持续区域系统合作研究项目(T221101034);教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(21JZD029)。
摘 要:在新时代国家区域协调战略和共同富裕理念背景下,文章探究空间尺度干预政策调控个体层面共同富裕过程中存在的“得”与“失”,这对发挥区域协调政策调控的精准性具有重要意义。文章运用2001—2017年中国30个省份的面板数据,研究了区域平衡性干预政策对共同富裕的影响及作用机制。实证结果表明,平衡性干预政策对共同富裕有显著促进作用。在此作用中,资本存量发挥正向中介作用,全要素生产率对共同富裕存在“遮掩效应”,而劳动存量中介作用有限。进一步研究表明:第一,平衡性干预政策主要通过提升居民富裕水平以促进共同富裕;第二,平衡性干预政策主要通过要素质量、配置、流动与升级影响全要素生产率;第三,劳动力流动在平衡性干预政策影响共同富裕过程中发挥中介作用。文章以区域平衡性干预政策为出发点,评估该政策对推进共同富裕的有效性,为共同富裕的理论与实践提供参考。The pursuit of common prosperity constitutes a foundational tenet of socialism and stands asa prominent facet of the Chinese-style modernization paradigm.The advancement of harmonized regional development emerges as an inexorable requisite and the fundamental rationale for realizing common prosperityof the society.Within the present historical epoch dedicated to the enhancement of societal common prosperity,it becomes paramount to scrutinize the efficacy of spatial-scale intervention policies in engendering common prosperity at the individual level.Using the panel data encompassing 30 provinces in China from 2001 to 2017,this paper employs the econometric model to delve into the ramification and underlying mechanism of regional balanced interventionpolicies on common prosperity.The results show that the policies markedly elevate common prosperity.Thiseffect is underscored by a positive mediating role of capital stock,a negative mediating impact of TFP,and adelimited contribution from labor stock.Subsequent investigations elucidate the following aspects:First,balanced intervention policies advance common prosperity by enriching the citizenry.Second,balanced intervention policies yield their impact on TFP through the enhancement of factor quality,the judicious allocation ofresources,the facilitation of factor mobility,and the promotion of technological upgrading.Third,labor mobility plays a pivotal mediating role in the positive effect of balanced intervention policies on common prosperity,with its significance being particularly pronounced in instances of familial labor mobility.Henceforth,governmental authorities are well-advised to synergistically deploy policy instruments encompassing income distribution,industrial division,digital transformation,and household registration to harness the precision of balancedintervention policies in the pursuit of common prosperity.The contributions of this paper are as follows:First,from an empirical perspective,it evaluates the effectiveness of balanced intervention policies
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49