法律行为规范对身份行为的有限适用  

Limited Application of Legal Act Norms to Status Acts

作　　者：刘征峰[1] LIU Zhengfeng(Law School,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073,China)

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学法学院,武汉430073

出　　处：《现代法学》2024年第1期33-47,共15页Modern Law Science

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目“体系视角下婚姻家庭关系法律适用问题研究”(18CFX075);中南财经政法大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2722023BY009)。

摘　　要：身份行为的构造依托于以意思表示为要素的抽象法律行为框架,不能以事实先在性架空意思自治。即使家庭法没有明确规定,身份行为也存在成立和效力的判断问题。根据纯粹身份行为和身份财产行为的区分概括描述适用模式的意义有限,即使是身份财产行为,也不能当然适用法律行为规范,而必须结合具体行为的性质以及所涉法律行为规范之利益状态进行个别化检视。在具体的规范适用检视中,应当首先考虑立法者的法政策决断,然后再考虑不同身份行为的本质。限制法律行为规范的适用往往意味着对当事人意思自治的限制,其背后往往存在维护身份关系安定性及公共利益的特殊考量。legal acts centered on the declaration of will,and the so-called factual priority cannot be used to override the autonomy of will.Even in the absence of explicit provisions in family law,there are issues regarding the formation and validity of status acts.The generalized description of the application model based on the distinction between pure status acts and status-property acts is of limited significance.Even for status-property acts,legal act norm cannot be applied ipso facto,but must be examined individually,taking into account the nature of specific act and the state of interests of the legal act norms involved.In the specific examination of norm application,the legislative policy decisions should be considered first,and then the essential nature of different status acts.Restricting the application of legal act norms often implies limiting the autonomy of the parties,behind which there are often special considerations of maintaining the stability of family relations and the public interests of society.

关 键 词：身份行为 法律行为 事物本质 法律适用 意思自治 

分 类 号：DF51[政治法律—民商法学]