检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:董一胜[1] 傅洁洁 李鹏[3] 高胤 DONG Yi-sheng;FU Jie-jie;LI Peng;GAO Yin(Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058,China;Center for Cognition and Brain Disorders,School of Clinical Medicine and the Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University,Hangzhou 311121,China;Faculty of Education,Yunnan Normal University,Kunming 650500,China;Zhejiang Gongchen Isolation Detoxification Rehab Center,Hangzhou 310011,China)
机构地区:[1]浙江大学心理与行为科学系,杭州310058 [2]杭州师范大学附属医院临床医学院认知与脑部疾病中心,杭州311121 [3]云南师范大学教育学部,昆明650500 [4]浙江省拱宸强制隔离戒毒所,杭州310011
出 处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2024年第1期100-106,38,共8页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基 金:教育部产学合作协同育人项目(项目编号:220800643122653)。
摘 要:目的:修订多维自我控制量表(The Multidimensional Self-Control Scale,MSCS)中文版及其简版,并对量表进行验证性因素分析和信效度检验。方法:抽取556名浙江大学本科生、研究生及部分校外培训人员样本进行测查,再从此样本中抽取282人测定自我控制量表(The Self-Control Scale,SCS)中文版用于效标效度验证。从556名被试中抽取151人间隔3周后进行重测。结果:验证性因素分析结果显示,MSCS中文版的双因素模型拟合最好(χ^(2)/df=2.144,GFI=0.910,NFI=0.864,IFI=0.922,TLI=0.907,CFI=0.921,RMSEA=0.047,SRMR=0.047)。简版量表的双因素模型拟合最好(χ^(2)/df=3.937,GFI=0.977,NFI=0.923,IFI=0.941,TLI=0.860,CFI=0.940,RMSEA=0.076,SRMR=0.040)。MSCS中文版各维度的内部一致性信度为0.721~0.826(简版为0.628和0.596),间隔3周后,各维度的重测信度为0.615~0.850(简版为0.792和0.649)。以自我控制量表(SCS)中文版的总分及各维度得分作为效标,其相关为0.447~0.757,P<0.01(简版为0.437~0.746,P<0.01)。简版与完整版的总分及两个维度得分的相关分别为0.913及0.885、0.858,P<0.01。结论:MSCS中文版及简版均具有较好的信度和效度。Objective:To revise the Chinese version of the Multidimensional Self-Control Scale(MSCS) and its abbreviated version.Methods:A sample of 556 undergraduate and graduate students from Zhejiang University,as well as some external trainees,was surveyed.From this sample,282 individuals were selected to take the Chinese version of the Self-Control Scale(SCS) for criterion validity verification.A subset of 151 participants from the 556 was retested after an interval of3 weeks.Results:The results of the confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the bi-factor model of the revised MSCS Chinese version had the best fit(χ^(2)/df=2.144,GFI=0.910,NFI=0.864,IFI=0.922,TLI=0.907,CFI=0.921,RMSEA=0.047,SRMR=0.047).The brief version's bi-factor model also showed a good fit(χ^(2)/df=3.937,GFI=0.977,NFI=0.923,IFI=0.941,TLI=0.860,CFI=0.940,RMSEA=0.076,SRMR=0.040).The Cronbach's coefficients of each dimension of the revised MSCS Chinese version ranged from 0.721 to 0.826(brief version:0.628 and 0.596).After 3 weeks later,the test-retest reliability of each dimension ranged from 0.615 to 0.850(brief version:0.792 and 0.649).Using the total score and dimensional scores of the Chinese revised Self-Control Scale(SCS) as criteria,their correlations ranged from 0.447 to 0.757,P<0.01(for the brief version:0.437 to 0.746,P<0.01).The correlations between the total scores and the scores of the two dimensions for the abbreviated and full versions were 0.913,0.885,and 0.858,respectively.Conclusion:Both the revised MSCS Chinese version and its brief version have good reliability and validity.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.185