检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:叶志星 YE Zhixing(Law School,South China University of Technology,Guangzhou 510000,China)
出 处:《黑龙江环境通报》2024年第3期138-141,共4页Heilongjiang Environmental Journal
摘 要:《民法典》的“绿色原则”及各编中绿色条款共同构成我国民法典的绿色规范,“绿色原则”的责任属性贯穿整部民法典,在总则部分、物权编、合同编以及侵权责任编均有体现,但是在后《民法典》时代,民法典中的环境民事责任也存在责任内容含糊不清、适用范围不明、民事法律后果缺失等不足。绿色原则在环境民事责任方面已有所体现,但仍有完善必要。本文从责任视角出发,对《民法典》中的绿色原则进行功能上的体系化解读,并结合司法解释、环境法典和司法实践进行补充与完善。The"green principle"in the Civil Code,along with the green clauses in each section,constitute the green norms of China's Civil Code.The liability nature of the"green principle"runs through the entire Civil Code,being reflected in the general provisions,property law,contract law,and tort liability sections.However,in the post-Civil Code era,there are shortcomings in the environmental civil liability,such as unclear liability content,unclear scope of application,and the lack of civil legal consequences.While the"green principle"have been reflected in environmental civil liability,there is still room for improvement.This paper,from the perspective of liability,systematically interprets the"green principle"in the Civil Code and supplements and improves them in combination with judicial interpretations,environmental codes,and judicial practices.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.1.209