检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙司宇 SUN Siyu(School of Education,Renmin University,Beijing 100872,China;Higher Education Professional Committee of Chinese Society of Educational Development Strategy,Beijing 100872,China)
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学教育学院,北京100872 [2]中国教育发展战略学会高等教育专业委员会,北京100872
出 处:《世界教育信息》2024年第2期68-80,共13页Journal of World Education
摘 要:自2001年引入初级教授职位以来,德国高校教师评价开始注重以绩效为导向进行改革。文章选取柏林洪堡大学、柏林工业大学、柏林自由大学三所柏林高校联盟中的精英高校作为案例,围绕教师评价目标、评价内容与标准、评价程序与方法和评价结果运用等维度展开分析,发现德国高校教师评价在发展过程中不断明确教师评价目标,强调学校与教师协同发展,构建多元评价标准体系,结合实际预留评价弹性空间,规范院校两级评价程序,强化评价公平性与透明度。其特点和趋势可为我国高校教师评价体系改革提供思路与借鉴。Since the introduction of the junior professor position in 2001,the reform of teacher evaluation in German universities has begun to focus on performance.In this study,three elite universities in Berlin University Union,Humboldt University Berlin,Technical University Berlin,and Free University Berlin,are selected as case studies,to analyze the dimensions of teacher evaluation objectives,evaluation contents and standards,evaluation procedures and methods,and the use of evaluation results.It is found that the evaluation of German university teachers continuously clarifies the objectives of teachers' evaluation in the process of development,emphasizes the synergistic development of the university and teachers,builds a diversified evaluation standard system,reserves the flexibility space in the light of the actual situation,standardizes the evaluation procedure at two levels of institutions,and strengthens the evaluation fairness and transparency.Its characteristics and trends can provide ideas and reference for the reform of the evaluation system of university teachers in China.
分 类 号:G645[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222