检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙玉红[1] 李金哲 张奇[1] SUN Yuhong;LI Jinzhe;ZHANG Qi(Dongbei University of Finance and Economics,Dalian 116025)
机构地区:[1]东北财经大学国际经济贸易学院,辽宁大连116025
出 处:《首都经济贸易大学学报》2024年第1期51-65,共15页Journal of Capital University of Economics and Business
基 金:教育部国别和区域备案研究中心“东北财经大学上海合作组织研究中心”(GQ17100)。
摘 要:以64个国家1995—2017年141个区域贸易协定为样本,在测度竞争政策规则深度的基础上,实证考察其对出口国内增加值的影响。研究结果表明:竞争政策规则的强化有助于提升缔约方出口国内增加值。该结果经过稳健性检验后依然成立。机制分析结果表明,缔约方制度质量加强了竞争政策规则对出口国内增加值的促进作用,但区域贸易协定灵活度会阻碍该促进作用。区分条款发现,横向原则与国有企业条款可以促进出口国内增加值;区分国别发现,竞争政策规则对不同经济发展水平国家出口国内增加值存在异质性影响。进一步分析发现,竞争政策规则的强化对第三方国家存在溢出效应。因此,中国应有意识地强化竞争政策的基础性地位,合理设计竞争政策条款并逐步提升执行度,打造更为开放透明、公平竞争的市场环境。Competition policy rules can curb anti-competitive behaviors in international trade and create a fair and competitive trading environment.This complementary arrangement of trade liberalization measures has a significant impact on trade and investment flows,affecting countries’real gains from trade.However,the formulation of competition policy rules faces the dilemma of building a fair international market environment and conflicting with domestic industrial policies.Therefore,the importance of international competition rules is becoming increasingly prominent.This paper examines differences in competition policy provisions in regional trade agreements(RTAs)and investigates the potential effects of competition policy rules on domestic export value-added and the mechanisms.The aim is to provide empirical evidence to support China’s efforts to increase the value-added of its exports.Taking 141 RTAs of 64 countries from 1995 to 2017 in the GVC-OECD database of the University of International Business and Economics(UIBE)as the research object,this paper evaluates the relationship between competition policy rules in RTAs and domestic value added in exports and its impact mechanism in a multi-dimensional way.Empirical results show that strengthening competition policy rules enhances members’domestic export valueadded,in which the horizontal principle and state-owned enterprise(SOE)provisions make significant contributions.The result still holds after the robustness test.The mechanism analysis suggests that the quality of parties’institutions strengthens the promotion of competition policy rules on domestic export value-added,but RTA flexibility hinders the promotion.Further analysis reveals heterogeneity in the impact of RTA competition policy rules on domestic export value-added among countries with different levels of economic development,and strengthening competition policy rules has spillover effects on third-party countries.Given the promotion of RTA competition policies on domestic export value-added,China
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.17.185.36