检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑登攀[1] 宣惠芳 ZHENG Dengpan;XUAN Huifang(School of Management,Hangzhou Dianzi University,Hangzhou 310018,Zhejiang,China)
机构地区:[1]杭州电子科技大学管理学院,浙江杭州310018
出 处:《信息与管理研究》2024年第1期66-77,共12页Journal of Information and Management
基 金:浙江省软科学项目(2020C35017)。
摘 要:以2016至2020年沪深A股上市公司专利侵权诉讼案件为样本,实证分析企业提起专利侵权诉讼时赔偿额、诉讼费用以及案件审级等诉讼细节对其技术创新的影响。研究表明:企业以往承担的诉讼费用越高,即企业越倾向于采用专利侵权诉讼保护技术创新成果,越有利于企业技术创新,且相比成熟期企业,诉讼费用对初创期企业技术创新的促进作用更强。另外,赔偿额会显著促进企业技术创新,案件审级对企业技术创新无显著影响。针对不同成熟度企业提出相应的专利侵权纠纷解决建议。Taking the patent infringement litigation cases of Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed companies from 2016 to 2020 as samples,the hierarchical regression analysis method is adopted to empirically investigate the influence of factors such as compensation amount,litigation expenses and case trial level on technological innovation of enterprises when they file patent infringement lawsuits.The research shows that:the higher the litigation expenses borne by enterprises in the past,that is,the more inclined enterprises are to adopt patent infringement litigation to protect technological innovation achievements,the more conducive to technological innovation of enterprises;compared with mature enterprises,litigation expense has a stronger promoting effect on technological innovation of enterprises in the start-up stage;the compensation amount significantly promotes the technological innovation of enterprises,while the case trial level has no significant influence.Some corresponding patent infringement dispute resolution suggestions are put forward for enterprises of different maturity.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.14.134.62