检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]国浩律师(上海)事务所 [2]华东政法大学刑事法学院
出 处:《海关与经贸研究》2023年第6期103-115,共13页Journal of Customs and Trade
摘 要:社会公共利益在承认及执行域外商事仲裁裁决案件中的“安全阀”作用已被各国的立法及司法实践所肯定。为了支持国际商事仲裁事业的发展,我国法院秉持谨慎解释的原则,很少适用社会公共利益条款拒绝承认及执行域外商事仲裁裁决。本文通过对我国司法实践中具体案例的分析,探索我国法院在承认及执行域外商事仲裁裁决案件中对社会公共利益的运用和把握尺度,提出对承认及执行域外商事仲裁裁决案件中社会公共利益的理解与完善设想。The role of social public interests as a“safety valve”in recognizing and enforcing for-eign commercial arbitration awards has been recognized in legislative and judicial practices worldwide In order to support the development of international commercial arbitration,Chinese courts,guided by the principle of cautious interpretation,rarely invoke social public interest provisions to refuse recognition and enforcement of foreign commercial arbitration awards This paper,through an analysis of specific ca-ses in Chinese judicial practice,explores how Chinese courts apply and weigh social public interests in recognizing and enforcing foreign commercial arbitration awards It also proposes ideas for a better under-standing and improvement of the concept of social public interests in recognizing and enforcing foreign commercial arbitration awards.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.40