检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王林旭 杨浩[2,3] 王军[1,2] WANG Linxu;YANG Hao;WANG Jun
机构地区:[1]北京大学信息管理系,北京100871 [2]北京大学数字人文研究中心,北京100871 [3]北京大学人工智能研究院,北京100871
出 处:《中国图书馆学报》2024年第1期115-127,共13页Journal of Library Science in China
基 金:国家自然科学基金国际重点合作项目“中国儒家学术史知识图谱构建研究”(项目编号:72010107003)的研究成果。
摘 要:学案体是记述学术源流的主要体裁,学案体史书为研究历代学术思想史提供了翔实可靠的文献资料。本文利用学案体文献的体例特征,对学术关系进行统计、分类和绘图,实现对儒学流派和师承、家学渊源和交游等关系的可视化呈现,描绘学术史的整体特征。本文从三个层面展开分析:在宏观层面上,对学案体文献中的人物及关系数量予以统计描述以了解学术背景;在中观层面上,对学案传承、学术源流进行可视化;在微观层面上,通过“先驱→同辈→后继”这一关系序列构建学术传承网络,以发现学案中的“学派”。本文展现了数字人文方法在跨时代儒家学术史研究中的应用潜力,用可视化的方式生动呈现了学案体文献之间的联系,为传统的人文研究提供了新视角和新方法。图7。表2。参考文献32。This paper has practiced digital methods in the field of philology through quantitative analyzing and visualizing the relationship among scholars in the ancient Chinese academic history.There exist many kinds of styles in compiling Chinese academic history,but the Scholar Cases,also called Xue-an,are proper to the internal requirements of academic history.By statistics,visualization and classification,we reorganize the content of books(including Song Yuan Xue-an,Ming Ru Xue-an and Qing Ru Xue-an) to picture the general characteristics of academic history.We propose a three-level framework to analyze the academic relationship which were recorded in historical document.At the macro level,we can realize the academic background by the statistics of characters and relationships.At the meso level,the visualization of the evolvement of the academic communities plays an important part.By comparing the different time,we can find the obvious difference.The academic schools interplayed and contended in the Song and Yuan Dynasties.In the Ming Dynasty,most of peoples were influenced by WANG Yangming,except ZHAN Ruoshui and his students.By the Qing Dynasty,academic schools lack relation.At the micro level,we dig into the content of the text,and construct the network of academic inheritance through the relationship like “pioneer→peer→successor”.The network verifies the high influence and closeness of scholars in the “central circle”.This paper analyzes the relation among scholars from the title and content of the three books by social network analysis and visual analysis.A new practice of studying academic development is constructed to show the various relations among different scholar cases.The conclusions are completely based on the statistical analysis and visual analysis,which provide an objective and accurate basis for the study of ancient academic history.And those conclusions are in line with the prevailing view of existing research,illustrating the usability and reliability of the digital humanities approach
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222