从债的契约式及诉讼实践看清代边疆治理的内地法化——以额济纳旗档案馆藏光绪年间两则案例为说  

Inland-Changing of Borderland Governance during the Qing Seen in the Contract Form of Debt and Litigation Practice:A Case Study of Two Cases of the Guangxu Period Recorded in the Ejina Archives

作　　者：平平 PING Ping

机构地区：[1]内蒙古师范大学马克思主义学院,内蒙古呼和浩特010022

出　　处：《西部蒙古论坛》2023年第4期62-69,M0004,共9页Journal of the Western Mongolian Studies

摘　　要：清代国家政权表达中,边疆治理与内地治理是平行和各有侧重的体系,但是,通过法律制度运作的实际不难发现,国家治理、国家法在具体的司法实践中可能展现出与官方表达不一样的景象。本文选取清光绪年间两则债法案例进行全面分析,展示额济纳土尔扈特人日常民事法律生活中的债的契约化及诉讼实践,指出清政府在蒙古地区实行的以盟旗制度、《蒙古律例》为主的边疆治理体系,随着经济社会发展、人口增长与流动、商贾进入游牧地区频繁贸易,治理方式方法日渐内地法化,国家法最终渗透到边疆基层社会,从而推动了清末国家对边疆地区治理的整合和深入。In the expression of state power in the Qing Dynasty,border governance and inland governance were parallel and each had its own emphasis.However,through analysis of the operation of the legal system,it is not difficult to find that national governance and national law may exhibit different scenes from official expression in specific judicial practice.This article comprehensively analyzes two cases of debt law during the reign of Emperor Guangxu,showcasing the contractual and litigation practices of debt in the daily civil legal life of the Ejina Torguts.It points out that the Qing government implemented a border governance system among the Mongols,mainly based on the banner system and the Mongol Code.With the development of the economy and society,population growth and mobility,and frequent trade with merchants entering nomadic areas,the governance methods and methods had increasingly shown inland changing so that the national law eventually penetrated into the grassroots society of the borderland,promoting the integration and deepening of the governance of the borderland by the state in the late Qing Dynasty.

关 键 词：诉讼实践 边疆治理 内地法化 

分 类 号：K252[历史地理—历史学]