档案延期开放的判断依据与时限问题探究  

Research on the Judgment Basis and Time Limit of Delayed Opening of Archives

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:王巧玲[1] 刘胜男 Wang Qiaoling;Liu Shengnan(College of Applied Arts and Sciences,Beijing Union University,Beijing 100191)

机构地区:[1]北京联合大学应用文理学院,北京100191

出  处:《档案与建设》2024年第2期67-73,共7页Archives & Construction

基  金:国家档案局2022年委托科研项目“《机关档案开放审核办法》制度研究”;北京市档案局2022年科研项目“新形势下档案开放审核工作方法研究”(项目编号:2022-10)阶段性研究成果。

摘  要:文章聚焦档案延期开放判断依据与时限问题,在对现行法规性文件中档案延期开放的判断依据进行梳理后,将其分为六大类:(1)仍属于国家秘密的;(2)涉及可能危及国家安全和社会稳定信息的;(3)涉及知识产权的;(4)涉及个人信息的;(5)档案捐赠者要求延期开放或是不开放的;(6)其他按照有关法律、行政法规和国家有关规定应当延期开放的,并重点就第(2)(3)(4)类情形的延期时限问题展开了详细讨论。文章最后指出,基于避免出现永久性豁免开放情形的考虑,应设置在常规封闭时限到期后定期滚动再审的制度安排。This paper focuses on the criteria and time limit for judging the delayed opening of archives.It sorts out the criteria for determining the delayed opening of archives in current regulatory documents and divides them into six categories:(1)those that still belong to state secrets;(2)information related to national security and social stability that may bring potential risk;(3)involving intellectual property rights;(4)involving personal information;(5)the archive donor requests delayed opening or closure;(6)other situations that delayed opening are required in accordance with relevant laws,administrative regulations,and national regulations,which are discussed in detail,with a focus on the issue of extension time limits for situations in categories(2),(3),and(4).At the end of the paper,it is pointed out that in order to avoid the permanent exemption of opening,a system arrangement of regular rolling retrial should be established after the expiration of the regular closure period.

关 键 词:档案开放 审核 延期开放 档案法 时限 

分 类 号:G273.5[文化科学—档案学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象