检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑丽英 朱碧帆 李芬[2] 陈多[2] 徐嘉婕 金春林[1,2] Zheng Liying;Zhu Bifan;Li Fen(School of Public Health,Fudan University,Shanghai,200032,China;Shanghai Health Development Re-search Center(Shanghai Medical Scientific Technology Information Institution),Shanghai,200031,China;不详)
机构地区:[1]复旦大学公共卫生学院,上海200032 [2]上海市卫生和健康发展研究中心(上海市医学科学技术情报研究所),上海200031
出 处:《中国卫生经济》2024年第1期92-96,共5页Chinese Health Economics
基 金:上海市卫生健康委员会科研项目(20224Y0101)。
摘 要:住院按疾病诊断相关分组(Diagnosis Related Group,DRG)付费和门诊按人头付费等付费方式,在保障参保人员基本权益、提高医疗保障基金使用效率等方面取得积极成效。但是,对于慢性病和康复护理这类住院周期较长、病情复杂的患者而言,住院费用按DRG支付方式并不合理。文章从改革历程、支付方式和监管举措3个方面介绍美国和德国对长期住院病例付费的做法经验,并从实现价值医疗、体现个体差异、探索复合支付方式、提高数据质量、建立约束机制5个方面提出对我国的启示,以供我国康复护理等长期住院患者实施按床日付费改革参考借鉴。The payment methods, such as Diagnosis Related Group(DRG) for hospitalization and capitation for outpatient treatment, have achieved positive results in protecting the rights and interests of insured persons and improving the efficiency of the use of medical insurance funds. However, for patients with chronic diseases and rehabilitation nursing, the hospitalization period is long and the conditions complicated, and the payment method of DRGs is not reasonable. It analyzes the experiences of paying for long-term hospital cases in the US. and Germany from the aspect of reform process, payment method and regulatory measures. In order to provide references for the reform of per-diem payment in rehabilitation nursing and other long-term hospitalized cases, it puts forward suggestions from aspects of realizing value care, reflecting individual differences, exploring complex payment methods, improving data quality and establishing constraint mechanism.
关 键 词:长期住院 住院 医保支付 改革 国际经验 美国 德国
分 类 号:R1-9[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学] R-01
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.221.240.145