数字贸易规则体系独立论:传统的延续还是全新的框架  

Systematic Independence Theory of Digital Trade Rules:Tradition Continuation or New Framework

作　　者：王一栋 WANG Yidong(Guangzhou College of Commerce)

机构地区：[1]广州商学院粤港澳大湾区法治研究院

出　　处：《国际贸易》2024年第2期18-27,共10页Intertrade

摘　　要：数字贸易的规则体系究竟是传统的延伸还是全新的框架,根本性地影响着国际数字贸易规则秩序与我国的数字贸易利益。各经济体对于数字贸易的概念与利益诉求异化,表现为单行立法与平行立法两种模式。在数字贸易议题的选取上,需要避免范式固化和认识论趋同的问题,并基于“国家行为”和“自然状态”两个维度对数字贸易议题进行重新切割,形成全新的模块化立法。数字贸易规则的主导国可能面临效率政策、秩序政策与中立性政策所构成的难以调和的“三元悖论”。我国应倡导以数字贸易规则独立性为基本方向、兼顾传统贸易规则的立法模式;采用以横纵向模块化立法为基本思路、兼顾数字模板的议题安排;推行以政策共识和普遍认可为基本原则、关照个体差异的政策机制。It fundamentally affects the international digital trade rules order and China’s digital trade interests that whether digital trade rules are extension of tradition or new framework.The dissimilation of concepts and interest demands of various economies towards digital trade is manifested in two modes of specific legislation and parallel legislation.In the selection of digital trade issues,it is necessary to avoid the problem of paradigm solidification and epistemological convergence,and to recut the digital trade issues based on the two dimensions of“state behavior”and“natural state”to form a new modular legislation.Countries that dominate digital trade rules may face“the impossible trinity”of efficiency policies,order policies,and neutrality policies.China should advocate the legislative model that takes the independence of digital trade rules as the basic direction and gives consideration to traditional trade rules;adopt the issue arrangement that takes the horizontal and vertical modularization legislation as the basic idea,while also takes the digital templates into account;promote a policy mechanism that takes policy consensus and general recognition as the basic principle and shows concerns on individual differences.

关 键 词：数字贸易规则 单行立法 议题模板 模块化立法 “三元悖论” 

分 类 号：F752.7[经济管理—国际贸易] F746.18[经济管理—产业经济]