现代性的内生路径与地方性的询唤可能--从潮汕书写重审“新南方写作”现象  

The Endogenous Path of Modernity and the Possibility of Interpellating Locality:Reexamination of the Phenomenon of New Southern Writing from Chaoshan Writing

作　　者：李玫琦 Li Meiqi

机构地区：[1]南京大学中国新文学研究中心

出　　处：《上海文化》2024年第2期39-47,共9页Shanghai Culture

基　　金：国家社科基金重点项目“中国新文学学术史研究”(项目号:20AZW015);教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“中国百年长篇小说的现实关怀与文体变迁研究”(项目号:22JJD750027)的阶段性成果之一。

摘　　要：新世纪的潮汕书写可以反哺“新南方写作”的理论建构。这些作品展现了中国海洋文明的精神影响,显示了启蒙与审美两种现代性的内生可能,同时表明潮语写作并非呈现新南方美学的最优装置,而剖析语言活动肌理、汲取潮汕讲古神韵,更能激发方言与国语间的艺术张力。对北人南迁的潮汕平原的“无根”状态之考察,则消解了“新南方写作”重构南北方文明序列的意图,揭示了全球化、城市化进程中的普遍精神困境与赛博朋克的乡村现实。这些潮汕书写以现代性与地方性为叙事之双翼,有效规避了“新南方学”理论赋魅的共时本质论风险。Chaoshan writing in the 21st century can feed back the theoretical construction of“New Southern Writing”.These literary works show the spiritual influence of Chinese maritime civilization,which reveals the endogenous possibility of enlightenment modernity and aesthetic modernity.The writing experience also indicates that Chaoshan dialectic writing is not the best device to illustrate New Southern aesthetics.Instead,in order to motivate the artistic tension between dialect and Mandarin,it is better to analyze language activities and then utilize Chaoshan legend's aesthetics.The investigation of the“rootless”situation of Chaoshan Plain which assembled lots of migrators from northern China to southern China,has deconstructed the intention of“New Southern Writing”to reorder the northern civilization and southern civilization in China,and it revealed that Chaoshan people are faced with spiritual dilemma during globalization and urbanization.These Chaoshan writings regenerate the narrative by interpellating modernity and locality,so that it can avoid the risk of synchronic essentialism in the theoretical enchantment of“New Southernism”.

关 键 词：潮汕书写 新南方写作 现代性 地方性 

分 类 号：I207.42[文学—中国文学]