检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:游力亮 郭善文 You Liliang;Guo Shanwen(College of Social Sciences,Taiwan Chengchi University,Taiwan 999079;Institute for Taiwan Studies,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084)
机构地区:[1]台湾政治大学社会科学学院,中国台湾999079 [2]清华大学台湾研究院,北京100084
出 处:《智库理论与实践》2024年第1期126-135,共10页Think Tank:Theory & Practice
摘 要:[目的/意义]研究马来西亚智库对“一带一路”倡议与“新南向政策”的认知,有助于中国内地把握“一带一路”倡议在东南亚面临的形势,进而优化与完善“一带一路”倡议。[方法/过程]本文选取马来西亚战略与国际问题研究所和马来亚大学中国研究所作为智库样本,对其发布的14份有关“一带一路”倡议和5份有关“新南向政策”的研究成果进行分析。[结果/结论]马来西亚主流智库认为:“一带一路”倡议带来了区域联通的机遇、促进了马来西亚的基础设施建设与经济发展效率;“新南向政策”具备科技、软实力等方面的优势,旨在减少对中国内地的经济依赖,并通过加强与东南亚国家的关系以此扩大中国台湾地区所谓的“国际空间”。总体而言,马来西亚主流智库对两者的认知均以正面评价为主,经济利益、民意与社会舆论则是其认知的主要动因。[Purpose/significance]The study of Malaysian think tanks’cognition of the Belt and Road initiative and the“New Southbound Policy”can assist Chinese mainland in understanding the challenges of the Belt and Road initiative in Southeast Asia,thus enabling the optimization and improvement of the initiative.[Method/process]This article takes the Institute of Strategic and International Studies of Malaysia and the Institute of China Studies of the University of Malaya as the sample for analysis,and analyzes fourteen research reports on the Belt and Road initiative and five research reports on New Southbound Policy published by them.[Result/conclusion]According to the Malaysian think tanks,exemplified by think tanks such as ISIS and ICS,the Belt and Road initiative has brought opportunities for regional connectivity,infrastructure development and economic development efficiency in Malaysia.Taiwan’s“New Southbound Policy”,with its advantages in technology and soft power,aims to reduce economic dependence on Chinese mainland and expand Taiwan’s“international space”and influence by strengthening relations with South and Southeast Asian countries.Overall,mainstream think tanks in Malaysia tend to have a predominantly positive perceptions of the Belt and Road initiative and“New Southbound Policy”,with economic interests,public opinion and public opinion as the main motivations for their perceptions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.12