检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:奚牧凉 XI Mu liang(School of Archaeology and Mu seology,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China)
出 处:《自然与文化遗产研究》2024年第1期27-36,共10页Study on Natural and Cultural Heritage
摘 要:文章通过案例,探讨了在当今中国大众媒介、大众舆论场域有关权益与话语的社区考古议题。可以看到:一方面,虽然在社区考古语境中确实存在“公”强“私”弱的二元结构,但大众媒介、大众舆论仍足以催化社区对于与考古类文化遗产有关权益的自觉;另一方面,虽然在社区参与对考古类文化遗产的大众媒介、大众舆论语境阐释议题时,官方话语同样强势,但社区阐释中可能的误读与延异分别带来的如身份认同建构与后现代解构,仍展现出社区考古尚存的话语权力的能动性。通过上述探讨,旨在管窥与强调社区考古乃至公众考古有关权益与话语的政治学属性。The article discusses community archaeological issues related to rights and discourse in today’s Chinese mass media and public opinion through case studies.It can be seen that although there is indeed a binary structure of“the public”being strong and“the private”being weak in the context of community archaeology,mass media and public opinion can still catalyze the communities’awareness of the rights related to archaeological cultural heritages.On the other hand,even though the official discourse still predominates in the interpretation of archaeological cultural heritages in the context of mass media and public opinion,issues such as identity construction and postmodern deconstruction caused by potential misunderstandings and differences in communities’interpretation still demonstrate the discourse power initiative that exists in community archaeology.Through the above discussion,the article aims to glimpse at and emphasize the political attributes of rights and discourse related to community archaeology and public archaeology.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.250.255