论我国人身损害残疾赔偿金量定标准的重构--基于裁判文书实证分析的比较与反思  

Reconstructing the Standards for Compensation Amount of Personal Injury Disability in China:A Comparative and Reflective Analysis Based on Empirical Analysis of Judicial Cases

作　　者：郝士铭 Hao Shiming

机构地区：[1]云南大学法学院,云南昆明650500

出　　处：《湖湘法学评论》2024年第1期64-80,共17页HUXIANG LAW REVIEW

基　　金：湖南大学重点前沿交叉学术研究项目:数量法学理论、方法及其应用(521208163)。

摘　　要：我国残疾赔偿金计算标准的科学性问题是被学界与立法所忽视的重大问题。基于1315份裁判文书,对我国残疾赔偿金量定法与奥格登量定法的比较分析发现,我国残疾赔偿金所采用的“等额量定模式”存在着计算准确度低、主观任意性太强的问题。于此,应结合奥格登量定法中“差额比较”的规范理论与“反事实因果推断”的实证方法,通过“有损害”与“无损害”的比较范式以及基于经验实证评估的规范价值评价来确定赔偿数额。应尽快制定适合我国国情的人身损害赔偿在线手册,确立因人而异的赔偿金收入计算标准以及赔偿年限,基于“差额量定模式”制定残疾赔偿金量定表,并根据社会经济发展状况适时予以动态更新。The scientificity of the calculation standard of disability compensation in China is a major problem ignored by academia and legislation.The empirical analysis based on the 1315 court verdicts reveals that the disability size,causality and compensation amount should be measured by combining the normative theory of“difference comparison”and the empirical method of“counterfactual causal inference”,through the comparative paradigm of“damage”and“no damage”as well as the normative evaluation based on the investigation.Therefore,it is a process of combing qualitative and quantitative,subjective and objective,normative and empirical methods.We should formulate an online manual of disability compensation suitable for national conditions as soon as possible,where the table of disability compensation should be based on the Ogden’s measurements,and dynamically update it in time according to the social-economic development.

关 键 词：残疾赔偿金 差额理论 金融保险 反事实因果推断 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学]