新加坡商事调解制度化及国际化路径研究——以《新加坡公约》的实施为背景  

Research on the Institutionalization and Internationalization of Commercial Mediation in Singapore from the Perspective of Implementing the Singapore Convention

作　　者：申琛 SHEN Chen

机构地区：[1]辽宁大学,辽宁沈阳110036

出　　处：《国际商务研究》2024年第2期65-76,共12页International Business Research

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“刑事诉讼中的财产权保护系统研究”(项目编号:18ZDA144)。

摘　　要：新加坡商事调解从中国式和马来式调解为代表的传统调解发展成为独立的商事调解制度,实现了商事调解国际化的发展,为我国商事调解制度构建提供了完整的路径参考。同时,新加坡是条约的首个批准国和生效国,在调解程序构造、适用标准、救济方式和救济申请程序等方面与《新加坡公约》存在较大差异的情况下,新加坡颁布《2020年调解法案》,落实该公约规定的国际义务并采用了双轨制衔接路径,为我国如何与《新加坡公约》衔接提供了经验参考。The Singapore Convention provides an international platform for the development of commercial mediation in China,but China is facing major challenges of how to construct a commercial mediation institution and how to link up with the Convention.Singapore’s commercial mediation developed from traditional mediation represented by Chinese and Malay mediation into an independent commercial mediation institution,and then realized the internationalization of commercial mediation.Singapore’s development provides a complete path reference for the construction of China’s commercial mediation institution.At the same time,Singapore is the first country to ratify and bring the Convention into force.While there are differences between its commercial mediation institution and the Convention,like,the concept of mediation,scope,relief methods and procedures,Singapore enacted the Mediation Act 2020 and adopted a dual-track path to link up with the Singapore Convention.This provides an experience reference for how to link up with the Singapore Convention for China.Since China is facing similar dilemmas,we should make full reference to Singapore’s experience and practice.

关 键 词：商事调解 《新加坡公约》 比较法分析 新加坡 

分 类 号：D997[政治法律—国际法学]