检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张诺涵 赵乐[1] 王迪 刘雨 王洪波[1] 李蓓蓓 梁友艳 郭军伟[1] ZHANG Nuohan;ZHAO Le;WANG Di;LIU Yu;WANG Hongbo;LI Beibei;LIANG Youyan;GUO Junwei(Zhengzhou Tobacco Research Institute of CNTC,Zhengzhou 450001,China;Qingdao Cigarette Factory,China Tobacco Shandong Industrial Co.,Ltd.,Qingdao 266300,Shandong,China)
机构地区:[1]中国烟草总公司郑州烟草研究院,郑州450001 [2]山东中烟工业有限责任公司青岛卷烟厂,山东省青岛市266300
出 处:《烟草科技》2024年第2期18-26,共9页Tobacco Science & Technology
摘 要:为了解决不同近红外光谱仪器采集相同样品的光谱不一致的问题,并提高烟草化学成分近红外预测模型的传递效果,建立了一种Q型因子光谱转移法(QFST)。该方法根据类间可分性原则,将众多原始变量归结为几个综合因子,利用综合因子重组主机和子机光谱矩阵,利用广义逆矩阵得出主机和子机光谱转换关系矩阵,从而实现主机和子机间的光谱转移。并将建立的QFST模型转移法与光谱空间转换(SST)和分段直接校正法(PDS)两种常用的模型转移方法进行了比较。结果表明:(1)对于烟草70种化学指标,QFST法和SST法的模型预测效果相差不大,整体预测效果优于PDS法。(2)应用QFST法、SST法和PDS法3种模型转移方法后进行预测,总植物碱、还原糖、总糖、总氮和氯等常规化学成分指标的R2均达到0.9以上。对于氨基酸和Amadori化合物等烟草中质量分数较低的化学成分来说,采用QFST法进行模型转移后预测的效果优于SST法。In order to solve the problem of spectral inconsistency of the same leaf sample collected by different NIR spectroscopies and to improve the transfer effects of NIR prediction models for chemical component analyses in tobacco,a Q-factor spectral transformation(QFST)method was established.According to the principle of inter-class separability,QFST classified many original variables into several comprehensive factors,which were used to reorganize the spectral matrixes.The QFST method derived the transformation relationship matrix by a generalized inverse matrix to realize the spectral transfer between the master and slave instruments.The QFST method was compared with the spectral space transformation(SST)and piecewise direct standard(PDS)methods,which were the common model transfer methods.The results showed that:1)For 70 different chemical indexes of tobacco,the prediction accuracies of the QFST and SST methods showed no major difference,and the overall prediction effects of both methods were better than the PDS method.2)The R2 of conventional chemical components such as total plant alkaloids,reducing sugars,total sugars,total nitrogen and chlorine were all above 0.9 after using the three model transfer methods.For amino acids and Amadori compounds,which are present at lower mass fractions in tobacco,the QFST method was better than the SST method in model transfer prediction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117