现代司法视阈下韦伯整体理性观的反思与重塑  

Reflection and Reshaping of Weber's Holistic Rationality from the Perspective of Modern Justice

作　　者：孙远航 Sun Yuanhang

机构地区：[1]吉林大学法学院

出　　处：《法制与社会发展》2024年第1期110-128,共19页Law and Social Development

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目“亲伦传统视阈下中国法律制度的本土化研究”(23AFX007)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：在中国学者看来,韦伯关于司法理性化的研究在实践和理论两个向度上都是可质疑的。在实践向度上,现代司法不是韦伯所说的纯粹的形式理性司法;在理论向度上,韦伯的整体理性观在根本上受限于其“自我指涉”的困境,这使得韦伯的特定理性类型不能表现出其整体理性观的内在统一性。基于对中美两国现代司法实践的分析,韦伯的特定理性类型不能展现和解释现代司法中多元理性共存的格局。“中庸理性”提供了一种不同于西方知识传统的、整体式的、能够有效整合与重塑韦伯整体理性观的“二阶观察”框架。基于“中庸理性”,韦伯的形式理性、实质理性和实用理性概念在现代司法视阈下可以得到重塑和展开。In the view of Chinese scholars,Weber's research on judicial rationalization can be questioned in both practical and theoretical aspects.Based on Weber's holistic rationality,the fundamental problem of the concept of “rationality” lies in the dilemma of “self-reference”,which makes Weber's specific concept of rationality unable to show the internal unity of his holistic rationality.Based on the analysis of modern judicial practice in China and the United States,Weber's concept of specific rationality cannot show and explain the pattern of coexistence of pluralistic rationality in modern justice.“the Golden Mean Rationality” provides an integral “Second-Order Observation” framework which is different from the Western knowledge tradition and can effectively utilize and remold Weber's rationalities.Based on the interpretation of “the Golden Mean Rationality”,the formal rationality,substantive rationality and practical rationality can be reorganized and unfolded in the visual threshold of modern justice.

关 键 词：司法理性 形式理性 实质理性 实用理性 二阶观察 

分 类 号：D916[政治法律—法学] D909.1