从德里达的“档案化”到中国的“档案化治理”--大数据时代档案学理论的“扬弃”  

From Derrida's"Archivization"to China's"Achivization Governance"with the"Sublation and Development"for Archival Theory in the Era of Big Data

作　　者：何嘉荪[1] He Jiasun

机构地区：[1]浙江大学公共管理学院信息资源管理系

出　　处：《浙江档案》2023年第12期32-33,36-38,共5页Zhejiang Archives

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“数据档案化治理的基础理论与实现路径研究”(22BTQ092)阶段性研究成果之一。

摘　　要：德里达实际上认为,凡信息在人脑外得到记录即“档案化”。既然如此,保证信息数据及其记录、演化过程自身,从始至终“真实、完整、准确”的管理(治理)活动,可称之为“档案化管理”。今天将其延伸至“数据治理”领域,则可称之为数据的“档案化治理”。这事实上要求在数据治理中运用档案学理论,但绝非“照搬”,而是走“扬弃”之路。一方面,在区分档案学基础理论与应用理论的基础上,对不适应新技术新实践的应用理论主动“抛弃”,另一方面,对揭示客观规律的档案学基础理论则在修正补充的基础上继续“发扬光大”。Derrida actually believes that any information that is recorded outside the human brain is"archivization".In this case,the management(governance)activities that ensure the"authenticity,completeness,and accuracy"of information data,and its recording and evolution process from beginning to end can be called"archiving management"or"archivization governance".Today,when it is extended to the field of"data governance",it can be called"archivization governance"for datas.In fact,this requires the application of archival theory in data governance,however it is not"copying",but taking the road of"sublating and developing".On the one hand,based on distinguishing between the basic theory and the applied theory of archival science,the applied theory that does not adapt to the new technology and new practice should be abandoned;and on the other hand,the basic theory that reveals the objective law continues to be carried forward under revision and supplementation.

关 键 词：大数据 档案化 档案化管理 数据档案化治理 档案学理论 

分 类 号：G270.7[文化科学—档案学]